Received: by 2002:a05:6358:9144:b0:117:f937:c515 with SMTP id r4csp6949770rwr; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 06:17:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350Z3lTWYddbYbtxA0hL9AO9Yuxy43kYcMimPmUbyFjEIC9vEuwtzycj/Yj+Dfp1lKsJgzBiL X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:918f:b0:f5:35f2:400c with SMTP id v15-20020a056a20918f00b000f535f2400cmr7490169pzd.4.1682428651055; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 06:17:31 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1682428651; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=HBSumD7HtMZwvbQSGz4Jnp03HuFqDmgFaDbuXBg5X+gAznpoYyemS6EC6fSYw/y8u6 GdVlh4StQg69MxU0z5JF5F1Ap6BeVwzJWzyIQetp9jMF25eKOy+e/HaaFnsqx+13Jbi/ e66qS6UHr0+iBRc3J6/wa9SLp3fnWko5SsW3omjuIVxPvshUcPJIiRUoy7ByN3aKDmY0 VqFwNzCfNvXsEMDm1APqgt461msywoode9mac9rjI6FhyNBwqvwV0z8L/5oK9x6GoGcT RTfxkjai2Llt4rtTi9SflWMLEZ9/TRmdmo8BmcKeZ6xyEszNDZLsz+zrxw/Oo04lOX6B G8jg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=Fw45IBooJRHvDJP+m4fpf4zEkBLCSMIA1zdZRImyULk=; b=kPsu6TNiq0+knoi9Z5ZirvrjUrfJVdxIAvLxTU7JFfMTrhJWEyMqnf5wAssMKaXA62 nTOcFrUZB+mKi7+hL3HbAO0V7LBX+gTnWhKQlO3OpBlJhZmbWNA+UsNLivpRHh+A48rr Ss+ax/gLSohp4Tlih3KzekCJeB/bEi1kQ30ZGIMdDe04Ga1oFFBkJmubDXTTUAzmqSwd Lw0RgTp6etr9BJLS671uKh+GWUE3CN7Gqqo+QIH+FhrGTGJm+bMsM1Ylb4gVJtoGYwZD 9mBZ871mFyLJ/aVAIoMpTEqzJLXzbAkq8AgPQ15oyEY6PAYcYC4KsAMIe7mSkAW5tTb+ vg6Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20221208 header.b=ZFeQwY+m; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n65-20020a632744000000b00514329f7ebdsi14576581pgn.344.2023.04.25.06.17.07; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 06:17:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20221208 header.b=ZFeQwY+m; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233658AbjDYNNk (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 25 Apr 2023 09:13:40 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41928 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234080AbjDYNNj (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Apr 2023 09:13:39 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x336.google.com (mail-wm1-x336.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::336]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01BD32D54; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 06:13:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x336.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-3f19c473b9eso81762685e9.0; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 06:13:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1682428416; x=1685020416; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Fw45IBooJRHvDJP+m4fpf4zEkBLCSMIA1zdZRImyULk=; b=ZFeQwY+mbxyNnRrEcmbP0LbvvvP/dsWeQIgdx1wq33ZQUes3ma9nFUCuBK4hm9D8t9 2vSSeOMEyQ0LiP9Ea/aEulIGGvevMxeLnyX30c2Z5/j52tRL1eu/G6MO48aSwKCZDfpC M0NVlp9ax8nlQDdqPDKR/yoGIZCdMkr6QVhAm8ZAcoC5L6Yij/fAwxda3Z4Rxsvayym3 ZIS0XIf5s1yauv4Dgt35c/+032/XoKewUsehNTRpykyaCw6+7fnF3R558UUePAloGEGs PwcryNMTI0ukCsjuIH+CmyQDVcehbv3oFZAOXlwjAyW81xxSy/RdsbbTFIF30oHWwQ0e mFpA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1682428416; x=1685020416; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Fw45IBooJRHvDJP+m4fpf4zEkBLCSMIA1zdZRImyULk=; b=RyoJgrdyvOvZVONejWGV16t0bYoRNJ5BgrK9dfF44ZMliyPtASmNeLiYsG4M5HyMJI wY+2JT3zgBMR9WVd9RJdoO05smisnaelV6lY9+hYscvXl5qAnym1TeGzVlll7LIdUPEv XaQPXs4jz/VFvUGQl8AaVNVK+t4+t7FT5+reFcYMG37rc4QwqIp6CQ6kdzh6K8V0aaKZ xEmU91GTreTGCWPYPywFDTjGJ0ipr+TemPLJvapKW4jFsiqFbT1Dvh89C/1ZNgmc8loE 5E7k/5XeJvSv5Ylx2ked7JmZipkgt5SjaIBjRO2+2AQj8qx6dPgFIM1pfPha+u58xHBv zbqw== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9fNaIiMCEk2oiRK/VoavQ3c05raDbq1wDvItdNfp8eh7LxWdGwX Ivp8zOJsApAZWgaUQb8SZD9h9y4JsdY= X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cc15:0:b0:3f1:65cb:8156 with SMTP id f21-20020a7bcc15000000b003f165cb8156mr10532957wmh.0.1682428416163; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 06:13:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from suse.localnet (host-95-245-6-24.retail.telecomitalia.it. [95.245.6.24]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d3-20020a05600c3ac300b003f19b3d89e9sm8697700wms.33.2023.04.25.06.13.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 25 Apr 2023 06:13:35 -0700 (PDT) From: "Fabio M. De Francesco" To: David Howells Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Matthew Wilcox , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Al Viro , Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , Jeff Layton , Christian Brauner , Chuck Lever III , Linus Torvalds , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, "Martin K. Petersen" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 41/55] iscsi: Assume "sendpage" is okay in iscsi_tcp_segment_map() Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 15:13:33 +0200 Message-ID: <16526634.geO5KgaWL5@suse> In-Reply-To: <494037.1682411430@warthog.procyon.org.uk> References: <1957131.PYKUYFuaPT@suse> <20230331160914.1608208-42-dhowells@redhat.com> <494037.1682411430@warthog.procyon.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On marted=EC 25 aprile 2023 10:30:30 CEST David Howells wrote: > Fabio M. De Francesco wrote: > > > - if (recv) { > > > - segment->atomic_mapped =3D true; > > > - segment->sg_mapped =3D kmap_atomic(sg_page(sg)); > > > - } else { > > > - segment->atomic_mapped =3D false; > > > - /* the xmit path can sleep with the page mapped so use > >=20 > > kmap */ > >=20 > > > - segment->sg_mapped =3D kmap(sg_page(sg)); > > > - } > > > - > > > + segment->atomic_mapped =3D true; > > > + segment->sg_mapped =3D kmap_atomic(sg_page(sg)); > >=20 > > As you probably know, kmap_atomic() is deprecated. > >=20 > > I must admit that I'm not an expert of this code, however, it looks lik= e=20 the > > mapping has no need to rely on the side effects of kmap_atomic() (i.e., > > pagefault_disable() and preempt_disable() - but I'm not entirely sure=20 about > > the possibility that preemption should be explicitly disabled along wit= h=20 the > > replacement with kmap_local_page()). > >=20 > > Last year I've been working on several conversions from kmap{,_atomic}(= )=20 to > > kmap_local_page(), however I'm still not sure to understand what's=20 happening > > here... > >=20 > > Am I missing any important details? Can you please explain why we still= =20 need > > that kmap_atomic() instead of kmap_local_page()? >=20 > Actually, it might be worth dropping segment->sg_mapped and segment->data= =20 and > only doing the kmap_local when necessary. >=20 > And this: >=20 > struct msghdr msg =3D { .msg_flags =3D flags }; > struct kvec iov =3D { > .iov_base =3D segment->data + offset, > .iov_len =3D copy > }; >=20 > r =3D kernel_sendmsg(sk, &msg, &iov, 1, copy); >=20 > should really be using struct bvec, not struct kvec - then the mapping is= n't > necessary. =46WIW, struct bvec looks better suited (despite I have very little knowled= ge of=20 this code). I assume that you noticed that we also have the unmapping counterpart=20 (iscsi_tcp_segment_unmap()) which should also be addressed accordingly. > It looks like this might be the only place the mapping is used, > but I'm not 100% certain. It seems that kmap_atomic() (as well as kmap(), which you deleted) is only= =20 called by iscsi_tcp_segment_map(), which in turn is called only by =20 iscsi_tcp_segment_done(). I can't see any other places where the mapping is= =20 used. I hope that this dialogue may help you somehow to choose the best suited wa= y=20 to get rid of that deprecated kmap_atomic(). Thanks for taking time to address questions from newcomers :-)=20 =46abio >=20 > David