Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758244AbXI3P0d (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Sep 2007 11:26:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754752AbXI3P00 (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Sep 2007 11:26:26 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:33677 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753807AbXI3P0Z (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Sep 2007 11:26:25 -0400 Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 17:26:22 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Alejandro Riveira =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez?= Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch/backport] CFS scheduler, -v22, for v2.6.23-rc8, v2.6.22.8, v2.6.21.7, v2.6.20.20 Message-ID: <20070930152621.GB24077@elte.hu> References: <20070926111357.GA10655@elte.hu> <20070928222631.25504d68@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20070928222631.25504d68@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.1.7-deb -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1923 Lines: 41 * Alejandro Riveira Fern?ndez wrote: > > Even if CFS v20.5 worked well for you, please try this release too, with > > a good focus on interactivity testing - because, unless some major > > showstopper is found, this codebase is intended for a v2.6.24 upstream > > merge. > > > > ( Even a quick, subjective report of: "checked this patch, it didnt > > crash and it feels like v20.5" or "laggier than v20.5" or "feels > > better than v20.5" is useful to us and enables us to judge the general > > direction of interactivity. ) > > I feel it better than 20.5 but the later is more stable. Let me > explain. > > I patched a 2.6.22.9 kernel with both versions 22 and 20.5[1]. With > the 22 version if i lock the screen (run screensaver) or i try to run > a wine program i experience a hard lock up no keyboard or mouse and i > have to reboot the machine (i can not try to access it via ssh > because i do not have a second machine). I run with the nvidia kernel > module so I know my report is useless but just for the record... Here > it is my config: hm. There are no similar reports so far. Could you try to run the wine program from a VGA text console (first do 'xhost +' in an xterm under X and then 'export DISPLAY=:0' in the text console) and see whether anything gets output to that console? Also enable nmi_watchdog=2 - which could print a backtrace of the point of the hard lockup. but in general there's nothing scheduler-specific about screensavers or wine - but it could be related to 3D mode of the chip (hence related to the nvidia module) - do you get a similar lockup if you try to run 'glxgears'? Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/