Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758413AbXI3RTq (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Sep 2007 13:19:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756898AbXI3RTj (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Sep 2007 13:19:39 -0400 Received: from web36605.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.85.22]:47457 "HELO web36605.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1755866AbXI3RTi (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Sep 2007 13:19:38 -0400 X-YMail-OSG: 2_7KHT4VM1mGiOYKJTgHcQg4Se.dXRMS7Sl7AyYbs4v2pVhP_LtHoUn0ivddXMo48YBwMeTS3wmOrat4IRj56QCWWUh28.RSd0GLME0Wkov0fwKP8vE- X-RocketYMMF: rancidfat Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 10:19:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Casey Schaufler Reply-To: casey@schaufler-ca.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Version 3 (2.6.23-rc8) Smack: Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel To: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton Cc: casey@schaufler-ca.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen , James Morris , Paul Moore In-Reply-To: <20070930095310.GA18642@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-ID: <863863.71085.qm@web36605.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1489 Lines: 37 --- Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 01:16:18AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > reviewed the August thread from your version 1 submission and the message I > > take away is that the code has been well-received and looks good when > > considered on its own merits, but selinux could probably be configured to > > do something sufficiently similar. > > > > I'd have trouble declaring that "but" to be a reason to not merge smack. > > I'm more thinking "let's merge it and see if people use it". > > I'm not sure this was discussed on the list, but as long as Casey doesn't > get rid of the magic symlinks (smackfs_follow_link), there's a clear NACK > from the VFS perspective. OK, this is news to me. What's the objection? > Otherwise the code looks pretty well written, alhough a run through > checkpath.pl to fix the lose end might help. Oh, and please to compile-time > initializations for the spinlocks and mutex currently initializes in > smack_init. Also the -Inet/netlabel looks rather odd, please work with > the netlabel maintainer to move the required files to the include/ > hierachy. Paul and I discussed this earlier, and will again. Thank you. Casey Schaufler casey@schaufler-ca.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/