Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752854AbXI3UGS (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Sep 2007 16:06:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751831AbXI3UGI (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Sep 2007 16:06:08 -0400 Received: from ns1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:56310 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751787AbXI3UGG (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Sep 2007 16:06:06 -0400 From: Andi Kleen Organization: SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Nuernberg, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) To: Theodore Tso Subject: Re: [PATCH] Version 3 (2.6.23-rc8) Smack: Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 22:05:57 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: Joshua Brindle , Andrew Morton , casey@schaufler-ca.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Morris , Paul Moore References: <46FEEBD4.5050401@schaufler-ca.com> <200709301939.57542.ak@suse.de> <20070930190742.GB9358@thunk.org> In-Reply-To: <20070930190742.GB9358@thunk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200709302205.58017.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1474 Lines: 36 > Yes, normally the network is outside the Trusted Computing Base (TCB), Normally as in the 99.99999% case. > but a cluster of Linux machines in a rack is roughly the same size of > a huge Unix server tens year ago --- and it's not like Ethernet is any > more secure than the PCI bus. PCI busses normally don't have routers to networks outside the box connected to them. > So don't be so quick to dismiss something like > CIPSO out of hand, just because it doesn't use IPSEC. With your argumentation we could also just disable all security in these situations (as in null LSM to save some overhead); after all these systems are protected by armed guards. If someone gets past the guards they could connect their laptop to the network and fake all the "secured" packets. If you assume that won't happen why do you need computer security at all? Anyways; if someone wants to cripple their security for some performance this way they can surely do this; but i don't think we should offer it as a default configuration option (just as we don't have a CONFIG_NULL_LSM even though there are undoubtedly systems that don't care about permission checking[1]) -Andi [1] I bet I gave the linux-tiny crowd an idea now ;-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/