Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753217AbXI3UbR (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Sep 2007 16:31:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751995AbXI3UbG (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Sep 2007 16:31:06 -0400 Received: from ccerelrim04.cce.hp.com ([161.114.21.25]:4443 "EHLO ccerelrim04.cce.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751925AbXI3UbF (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Sep 2007 16:31:05 -0400 From: Paul Moore Organization: Hewlett Packard To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] Version 3 (2.6.23-rc8) Smack: Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 16:30:47 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 Cc: casey@schaufler-ca.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen , James Morris References: <46FEEBD4.5050401@schaufler-ca.com> <20070930011618.ccb8351b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20070930011618.ccb8351b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200709301630.48443.paul.moore@hp.com> X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.9.30.130338 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1195 Lines: 24 On Sunday 30 September 2007 4:16:18 am Andrew Morton wrote: > - hm, netlabels. Who might be a suitable person to review that code? > Seems that Paul Moore is the man. Maybe he'd be interested in taking a > look over it (please?) Yep, I've been tracking Casey's work on this since the first patch and sending comments when appropriate. I'm going to take a look at the latest rev of the patch and if anything looks awry I'll be sure to let Casey know. The only real wart that still remains from the original patch is the code in smk_cipso_doi() which has a nice comment at the top saying that Paul and Casey need to work out an appropriate interface between NetLabel and SMACK. We punted on it before because SMACK's future was still a bit uncertain and SELinux has no need for an interface like this at present. Now that SMACK looks to be queued up for 2.6.24 it's time to revisit this discussion. -- paul moore linux security @ hp - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/