DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au;
  h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id;
  b=oEHK9JYjwUTAkECrISrZDdEWKv53kSTw/XXMg5Oi/u0Z0sRYc1fRblDp0YnXgwzx6v3n8MdIuhYdJVAKJ3w2thDwZRE0o9jW9fFsPTAuWu9VfGj4sY4L1WWhcPCumEsqTUf6QiUG2Dh7uPW0LQGwtlsxYKPoOHL+cZq6K988xD4=  ;
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>, Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.21 -> 2.6.22 & 2.6.23-rc8 performance regression
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 14:25:37 +1000
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5
Cc: Denys <nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20070930144443.M52139@visp.net.lb> <46FFE17C.9020202@cosmosbay.com>
In-Reply-To: <46FFE17C.9020202@cosmosbay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200709301425.37564.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 4002
Lines: 101

Hi Denys, thanks for reporting (btw. please reply-to-all when replying
on lkml).

You say that SLAB is better than SLUB on an otherwise identical kernel,
but I didn't see if you quantified the actual numbers? It sounds like there
is still a regression with SLAB?


On Monday 01 October 2007 03:48, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Denys a écrit :
> > I've moved recently one of my proxies(squid and some compressing
> > application) from 2.6.21 to 2.6.22, and notice huge performance drop. I
> > think this is important, cause it can cause serious regression on some
> > other workloads like busy web-servers and etc.
> >
> > After some analysis of different options i can bring more exact numbers:
> >
> > 2.6.21 able to process 500-550 requests/second and 15-20 Mbit/s of
> > traffic, and working great without any slowdown or instability.
> >
> > 2.6.22 able to process only 250-300 requests and 8-10 Mbit/s of traffic,
> > ssh and console is "freezing" (there is delay even for typing
> > characters).
> >
> > Both proxies is on identical hardware(Sun Fire X4100),
> > configuration(small system, LFS-like, on USB flash), different only
> > kernel.
> >
> > I tried to disable/enable various options and optimisations - it doesn't
> > change anything, till i reach SLUB/SLAB option.
> >
> > I've loaded proxy configuration to gentoo PC with 2.6.22 (then upgraded
> > it to 2.6.23-rc8), and having same effect.
> > Additionally, when load reaching maximum i can notice whole system
> > slowdown, for example ssh and scp takes much more time to run, even i do
> > nice -n -5 for them.
> >
> > But even choosing 2.6.23-rc8+SLAB i noticed same "freezing" of ssh (and
> > sure it slowdown other kind of network performance), but much less
> > comparing with SLUB. On top i am seeing ksoftirqd taking almost 100%
> > (sometimes ksoftirqd/0, sometimes ksoftirqd/1).
> >
> > I tried also different tricks with scheduler (/proc/sys/kernel/sched*),
> > but it's also didn't help.
> >
> > When it freezes it looks like:
> >   PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND
> >     7 root      15  -5     0    0    0 R   64  0.0   2:47.48 ksoftirqd/1
> >  5819 root      20   0  134m 130m  596 R   57  3.3   4:36.78 globax
> >  5911 squid     20   0 1138m 1.1g 2124 R   26 28.9   2:24.87 squid
> >    10 root      15  -5     0    0    0 S    1  0.0   0:01.86 events/1
> >  6130 root      20   0  3960 2416 1592 S    0  0.1   0:08.02 oprofiled
> >
> >
> > Oprofile results:
> >
> >
> > Thats oprofile with 2.6.23-rc8 - SLUB
> >
> > 73918    21.5521  check_bytes
> > 38361    11.1848  acpi_pm_read
> > 14077     4.1044  init_object
> > 13632     3.9747  ip_send_reply
> > 8486      2.4742  __slab_alloc
> > 7199      2.0990  nf_iterate
> > 6718      1.9588  page_address
> > 6716      1.9582  tcp_v4_rcv
> > 6425      1.8733  __slab_free
> > 5604      1.6339  on_freelist
> >
> >
> > Thats oprofile with 2.6.23-rc8 - SLAB
> >
> > CPU: AMD64 processors, speed 2592.64 MHz (estimated)
> > Counted CPU_CLK_UNHALTED events (Cycles outside of halt state) with a
> > unit mask of 0x00 (No unit mask) count 100000
> > samples  %        symbol name
> > 138991   14.0627  acpi_pm_read
> > 52401     5.3018  tcp_v4_rcv
> > 48466     4.9037  nf_iterate
> > 38043     3.8491  __slab_alloc
> > 34155     3.4557  ip_send_reply
> > 20963     2.1210  ip_rcv
> > 19475     1.9704  csum_partial
> > 19084     1.9309  kfree
> > 17434     1.7639  ip_output
> > 17278     1.7481  netif_receive_skb
> > 15248     1.5428  nf_hook_slow
> >
> > My .config is at http://www.nuclearcat.com/.config (there is SPARSEMEM
> > enabled, it doesn't make any noticeable difference)
> >
> > Please CC me on reply, i am not in list.
>
> Could you try with SLUB but disabling CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/