Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 27 Apr 2023 01:12:42 +0200
From:   Thomas =?utf-8?Q?Wei=C3=9Fschuh?= <linux@weissschuh.net>
To:     "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc:     linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] blk-integrity: drop integrity_kobj from gendisk
Message-ID: <862c1901-ee6e-44e5-8906-4bb1c3893372@t-8ch.de>
References: <20230309-kobj_release-gendisk_integrity-v3-0-ceccb4493c46@weissschuh.net>
 <yq1v8ivtzrn.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <yq1v8ivtzrn.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com>
Precedence: bulk

Hi Martin, Christoph, Jens,

On 2023-03-20 07:56:58-0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> > The embedded member integrity_kobj member of struct gendisk violates
> > the assumption of the driver core that only one struct kobject should
> > be embedded into another object and then manages its lifetime.
> >
> > As the integrity_kobj is only used to hold a few sysfs attributes it
> > can be replaced by direct device_attributes and removed.
> 
> Looks good to me and passed a quick test on a couple of systems. Thanks
> for cleaning this up!
> 
> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>

Am I getting some part of the process for block/ wrong?

It seems my patches for the block subsystem are having a hard time
getting merged.

* https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221110052438.2188-1-linux@weissschuh.net/
* this series
* https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230419-const-partition-v2-0-817b58f85cd1@weissschuh.net/

Thanks for any pointers,
Thomas