Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= <heiko@sntech.de>
To:     Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc:     palmer@dabbelt.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com,
        aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
        davem@davemloft.net, conor.dooley@microchip.com,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, christoph.muellner@vrull.eu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Implement GCM ghash using Zbc and Zbkb extensions
Date:   Thu, 27 Apr 2023 01:28:47 +0200
Message-ID: <5008634.irdbgypaU6@diego>
In-Reply-To: <20230426232331.GB65659@sol.localdomain>
References: <20230329140642.2186644-1-heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu> <7664296.GXAFRqVoOG@diego>
 <20230426232331.GB65659@sol.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

Am Donnerstag, 27. April 2023, 01:23:31 CEST schrieb Eric Biggers:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 01:20:31AM +0200, Heiko St?bner wrote:
> > But for me, this small bit of scalar crypto is also sort of a stepping
> > stone :-). Previous versions [0] already included patches using the
> > vector crypto extensions too, I just split that into a separate thing,
> > as _this_ series actually uses ratified extensions :-)
> > 
> > 
> > Heiko
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > [0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230313191302.580787-12-heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu/T/
> 
> That patchset wasn't sent to linux-crypto.  Can you make sure to include
> linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org on any subsequent patchsets?  Thanks!

yeah, that was a fault on my part, which I managed to rectify with v4 here
[haven't had time to send the vector part as separate v4 yet]

Will include linux-crypto in further submissions.


Heiko