Received: by 2002:a05:6358:9144:b0:117:f937:c515 with SMTP id r4csp705918rwr; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 07:11:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ7lcyteQjjNR+soseZTvMygc6+FgDa27HgQBYS2Jk3p69hD0Uv2ca7htCD9hi4V0FlT2Fj7 X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:124c:b0:1a6:6bdb:b548 with SMTP id u12-20020a170903124c00b001a66bdbb548mr2094325plh.1.1682604714532; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 07:11:54 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1682604714; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=LaQGs2F1yAZGLdTr+EbdU4G0tUCtBrmE9gYfhf+0m2zr96+t1zzYhptnVKfMdla2F/ kp3LhwCVTY7FHgWbsjK1eOv/jy1RqOPbV3Uh+XbpwX3OEPH9dLTOd7JOjib/AosS5tLl 0AJx4+54EPH01eBkxlo1D1BpKZj+iBuhO70x3ZwFer36CH3JdbWziT6o99XRjBogrisq ExvDIFqj5EidJ5s1c793mGlU7s+E+kmOeKd8nb226Upyx5TbkcHRQ8whH/adm3z4OBvY uaE5QnFqkP2RVTydwGNULzkO8xGNOvCKMczcC6Pl0RQGjAtJtriRNiFGJ8AOADYKHCPs b/tQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id; bh=MK9L4enEC6Gx5bl1B/Oln0NLQOu14clNWNeJZ2oU7QA=; b=giuDQDw7uVs7BuzWxkzhPkNgUaBg4Z92jRxRZTvnr/Jrqiln/NOxuIDNcz+nk3wqZo +FeVJbkZluyzbCRt9syDQmiCTZ4XCEs1c0u15cYzDLEbxGZglWAEJWSGdZkxz9ueTLTY +wBDopMe6keIie6/Y/UUgENr5hFGL0ql8sq1tA6QnhFVAJZzWJH/YAwEVYYYvBJPZ0FT yKT+yzQ/MQbSig1Zt8AQ4wu8qHoKreOUFXpnS6BDag1zRBo6fR8KXCW4OTqSUO2kVgwK Fe4HsUOoAJ8cF7Kv0pbobpyieDOZ+li7ns8CDdidbZzC7x+onpdGYHouMKhnL1FcVj00 ZfPg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u9-20020a170902a60900b001a9770780d5si10100462plq.343.2023.04.27.07.11.39; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 07:11:54 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243829AbjD0OK3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 27 Apr 2023 10:10:29 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59736 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S243827AbjD0OKZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Apr 2023 10:10:25 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121E54C39 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 07:10:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B96C14; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 07:11:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.196.177] (eglon.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.177]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5DC8D3F7D8; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 07:09:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <22efdde1-9b63-f11c-65ba-22cdca44600b@arm.com> Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 15:09:52 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/19] x86/resctrl: Add cpumask_any_housekeeping() for limbo/overflow Content-Language: en-GB To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ilpo_J=c3=a4rvinen?= Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Fenghua Yu , Reinette Chatre , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , H Peter Anvin , Babu Moger , shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, D Scott Phillips OS , carl@os.amperecomputing.com, lcherian@marvell.com, bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com, xingxin.hx@openanolis.org, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, Jamie Iles , Xin Hao , peternewman@google.com References: <20230320172620.18254-1-james.morse@arm.com> <20230320172620.18254-9-james.morse@arm.com> <816992e-a153-db6e-d3d7-84de1c1e1d59@linux.intel.com> From: James Morse In-Reply-To: <816992e-a153-db6e-d3d7-84de1c1e1d59@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Ilpo, On 21/03/2023 13:21, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > On Mon, 20 Mar 2023, James Morse wrote: > >> The limbo and overflow code picks a CPU to use from the domain's list >> of online CPUs. Work is then scheduled on these CPUs to maintain >> the limbo list and any counters that may overflow. >> >> cpumask_any() may pick a CPU that is marked nohz_full, which will >> either penalise the work that CPU was dedicated to, or delay the >> processing of limbo list or counters that may overflow. Perhaps >> indefinitely. Delaying the overflow handling will skew the bandwidth >> values calculated by mba_sc, which expects to be called once a second. >> >> Add cpumask_any_housekeeping() as a replacement for cpumask_any() >> that prefers housekeeping CPUs. This helper will still return >> a nohz_full CPU if that is the only option. The CPU to use is >> re-evaluated each time the limbo/overflow work runs. This ensures >> the work will move off a nohz_full CPU once a houskeeping CPU is >> available. >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h >> index 87545e4beb70..0b5fd5a0cda2 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h >> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h >> @@ -55,6 +56,28 @@ >> /* Max event bits supported */ >> #define MAX_EVT_CONFIG_BITS GENMASK(6, 0) >> >> +/** >> + * cpumask_any_housekeeping() - Chose any cpu in @mask, preferring those that >> + * aren't marked nohz_full >> + * @mask: The mask to pick a CPU from. >> + * >> + * Returns a CPU in @mask. If there are houskeeping CPUs that don't use >> + * nohz_full, these are preferred. >> + */ >> +static inline unsigned int cpumask_any_housekeeping(const struct cpumask *mask) >> +{ >> + int cpu, hk_cpu; >> + >> + cpu = cpumask_any(mask); >> + if (tick_nohz_full_cpu(cpu)) { >> + hk_cpu = cpumask_nth_andnot(0, mask, tick_nohz_full_mask); >> + if (hk_cpu < nr_cpu_ids) >> + cpu = hk_cpu; >> + } >> + >> + return cpu; >> +} >> diff --git a/include/linux/tick.h b/include/linux/tick.h >> index bfd571f18cfd..ae2e9019fc18 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/tick.h >> +++ b/include/linux/tick.h >> @@ -174,9 +174,10 @@ static inline u64 get_cpu_iowait_time_us(int cpu, u64 *unused) { return -1; } >> static inline void tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick_protected(void) { } >> #endif /* !CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON */ >> >> +extern cpumask_var_t tick_nohz_full_mask; >> + >> #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL >> extern bool tick_nohz_full_running; >> -extern cpumask_var_t tick_nohz_full_mask; > > Its definition seems to also be inside #ifdef: > > kernel/time/tick-sched.c-#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL > kernel/time/tick-sched.c:cpumask_var_t tick_nohz_full_mask; > kernel/time/tick-sched.c:EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tick_nohz_full_mask); Indeed, but all the uses are guarded by tick_nohz_full_cpu(), which the compiler knows is false if CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL is not selected. Moving the prototype is enough to let the compiler parse the code to check its correct, before dead-code-eliminating it. There is no need to carry around the cpumask if its never going to be used. This would only cause a problem if someone adds a user of tick_nohz_full_mask which isn't guarded by IS_ENABLED(). I argue that would be a bug. All this is being done to avoid more #ifdeffery!) Thanks, James