Received: by 2002:a05:6358:9144:b0:117:f937:c515 with SMTP id r4csp1078951rwr; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 12:02:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ56aA9PTnOQ3xttIPIRo3vqgW2FPOrez5/OEeVyrjbsMiyG4s7vw++6pu1dwHPF7A+mSPPy X-Received: by 2002:aa7:88cf:0:b0:639:28de:a91e with SMTP id k15-20020aa788cf000000b0063928dea91emr4472883pff.17.1682622148158; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 12:02:28 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1682622148; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=QLYH19L0Q5kfd5Pq+NtwP5eRg09iKqfaTWPWvJGNoL7Al5zPFIZew1yyOhS/24UJYG WYfHmXvcOR3QE4u3nOmW/Qhj8fabwK99qmbmnv3xHYRqhz3lbzaHvdz38nHIDM2L1VHp clAVemD9ampjt2w9C/++S5WZASlmvavFimJMO2dlmrsPji1SrT0pmRpkojT4Vq4l72Na FMQJ70f0xHJgbnMJSsXVnKX7Mth5E21z9c9PxyKHQ8WiyZ3Ry0WbUbgRRwK84I2D1lwQ 9QrR6NApKktZDBrkK2bTROIO7Sj+Z/JeEPMS1yP5wVczDZlEF4I7TpBHOk44Dn9iyVEL SpyQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:from:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:date:dkim-signature; bh=p9U1SOsooYSm5KCVEU0yHDPxyWSN0e4LiuZonUnfDNQ=; b=vShUl0rsXrQ2tq5WqrQtvv19JVCiPK66+RwnL1VZFFFpe7E363mBfyPUXKR/By2xVJ +W4NLLHyxqpzq1cgS2IcTdny/yPG6VrGAEnk5dWyledr5thj3v7yBVGgdwsTA4MOvatS FdWy8lSQ/YraEPAgp/PKNUa2h3dxWQgjAraBGRPKyOwWw8TVOP7cbmtKSjPuaLz1AzFD x5yJz9YD/VNVEa7FyTyrMByfOnWgy3QX1IWznqcqxltKeJ4E0OdRd9SLH5tJqFJfjxdj ecFHrqmbu/RRJLrShe72MbUDfoc94wYsXp8lLfgPRMPpo2ThYz5mjj186yKi1nw4JppT xcLA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20221208 header.b=zMSmc1aF; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g16-20020aa79f10000000b0063b82909b1esi18940223pfr.0.2023.04.27.12.02.13; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 12:02:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20221208 header.b=zMSmc1aF; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243737AbjD0S46 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 27 Apr 2023 14:56:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60248 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S243881AbjD0S44 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Apr 2023 14:56:56 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x44a.google.com (mail-pf1-x44a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::44a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAD24420C for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 11:56:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x44a.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-63b5a2099a6so5962744b3a.3 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 11:56:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20221208; t=1682621815; x=1685213815; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:in-reply-to:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=p9U1SOsooYSm5KCVEU0yHDPxyWSN0e4LiuZonUnfDNQ=; b=zMSmc1aF1XSfdbFL9HyL9CCLydy6DCbFGZA1Fx3wFEhk6SvhtmFqDmo+JPEA6HACbb bFeiiFjVM+v+eJ1GHEIabtFjYtvaGKO+3U1/sZUBkssmoAoM3aGshZDRps+5cnDHQQFx 84l0q+F5R/KTDUZcKKcRQAtY7ADo5KGcNvilWMeZw6t4mLahC302CxuXP2Y3kEp/ZLem PD9VktrgE1Au0nnNYrBb1FNgPkg1P5ndcLOOksuVLSajr4bQqD1DVG8rTbYCPqLisWis aiSgtSNs6JeqHssCoGvc+N1TbWmYvtVAfoqVwrgRw42nrFezkt2fU50nZVbF8rkLY0xO MfMQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1682621815; x=1685213815; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:in-reply-to:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=p9U1SOsooYSm5KCVEU0yHDPxyWSN0e4LiuZonUnfDNQ=; b=LnFZCQqZWUm9v/2EjnvhEuesBcGdwKz+A5QpDtIaHek3f0BITYFVGVPdYEoOd9XtK8 gkqV3Hkf/S9mc5Heeg+s7p3GIGjjM4DasvqFAHZdxgu2D6MRNSIrYA2y15eQosmiUwOs wbtbA+6QNdj0RHgMm5N12rQ/CzmGzXhTr1LvXVwMDGNg27tifZnhBw7G4oeLIU0hip1k aAQR0xIzkiKQE/14duejiPZoY7RjOgrLD3Kr4dI81pZ2VppB6rnDu+jvga70fUTs3iEG AGg7Ws9B8vf22JYfe6tUOad4suVpeLX811g2TXP4yT4r+KbSPpMRcIWlgbAs1RyUo8Yw 7CRA== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDyzpBOMQv3+3z8OeV4YV8XeqDYFopmOmOnbXFR1bgvL4LZD7V/t dFQv7iPqY0KIogE8A/akkGLrpFU= X-Received: from sdf.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:7f:e700:c0a8:5935]) (user=sdf job=sendgmr) by 2002:a05:6a00:80de:b0:63b:234e:d641 with SMTP id ei30-20020a056a0080de00b0063b234ed641mr729757pfb.4.1682621815279; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 11:56:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 11:56:53 -0700 In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20230427143207.635263-1-revest@chromium.org> Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Update the aarch64 tests deny list From: Stanislav Fomichev To: Florent Revest Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, kpsingh@kernel.org, mykolal@fb.com, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, xukuohai@huaweicloud.com, mark.rutland@arm.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/27, Florent Revest wrote: > On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 4:32=E2=80=AFPM Florent Revest wrote: > > > > This patch updates the list of BPF selftests which are known to fail so > > the BPF CI can validate the tests which pass now. >=20 > Note: I tested this denylist a few months back by sending a manual PR > to https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf. > At the time, it worked > https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/4106542133/jobs/708551= 4761 > (even though there seemed to be a known flake in the gcc variant but > unrelated to the new arch support) >=20 > Every time I wanted to have the CI run on my PRs, I had to annoy Manu > by email (I wouldn't have the rights to trigger the CI by myself > otherwise). So I haven't tested this *actual* patch rebased on the > current CI before sending it to the list. (e.g. the > module_fentry_shadow test has been added since then and I just assumed > it would pass in CI like the rest) >=20 > My understanding is that this patch should soon be picked up by the > testing bot and we can use that CI run to check that everything works > as intended. Let's wait for a CI green light before merging this! :) > If there are errors I'll send a v2 Looks green now: Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/4822595792/jobs/85907322= 78