Received: by 2002:a05:6358:9144:b0:117:f937:c515 with SMTP id r4csp1160123rwr; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 13:16:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ7Wpf32+sJhlLP+thGUu7e3SM00fNJ4Ecl5dc9rfHzwBb/YxN9pTqOf3pnT/P/RjmyCq+D/ X-Received: by 2002:aa7:88cf:0:b0:63e:fb6d:a1c0 with SMTP id k15-20020aa788cf000000b0063efb6da1c0mr3958178pff.33.1682626605018; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 13:16:45 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1682626605; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=YgT8Q8AHBON3eZOoUBM/hRP/COPBvB60kzWUr5l6xVVGLEZAo83v9feIbMqwTxbM8M uMS05z21NTwpOzE81k7r+1P/12hJCpWbHTq9rlee+n9OaKf5p2G0um0xhPWQLvxDnUdu f+yOPGu+JqLkLmwTQdEWaFR8j5TP9JzuG89fpahX5iO2XxqxyRb+HwxGrXxsuxFLZRUJ wYX0oV6za4pz+yMM2qC5d3OGTlzsUEdWMXkO5eyKLLt5TlolC4Uofyf56NLmUKKNCZ+V Yh4n3GhFZBRVWy0mCnh+DUksr/PXBv1fKpx0EeUS7M2svE8C/YBvrryGGeG/qEf77hTu DWyg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=rm4VFHyDYsqXBKBCZiX6B5oR3dBaXDqMYN7/nV3rI0o=; b=nELYZhOUhpZQRqy7o3rW+rskMcCUbcwu7uOSED3Sw5/NjRcEBUSb+U4BVqOyeoKCy9 tHGbkuSFEv/UX8dMXYLIYumylCKYLlgTe1kVTYwuKejK3C9w08HvIgHwG26Lvl04ICg+ 25N0+Ctko2JHsmD6t/q2W61gQI6cu2+bQzzh05sZ0+9I9JoKSPPCc7DsSC7wyxzYIrOc G12WDcpwb3qv4/7dFnk1N21yZhwC43qXo1QF75WHTzCuE2iko7o9Itsabij1JdUXQuLw L6Xnk1x9xUmi9lOXlHL+mlfOrBfITGLdf+av7SOQ/KhiFgVdYlQqMooB30yIkyiu9H2/ xHDQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@iogearbox.net header.s=default2302 header.b=oVjhWQHW; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=iogearbox.net Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 204-20020a6300d5000000b00520ad015da5si19852491pga.462.2023.04.27.13.16.29; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 13:16:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@iogearbox.net header.s=default2302 header.b=oVjhWQHW; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=iogearbox.net Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1344142AbjD0UK4 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 27 Apr 2023 16:10:56 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47620 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S245168AbjD0UKz (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Apr 2023 16:10:55 -0400 Received: from www62.your-server.de (www62.your-server.de [213.133.104.62]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D4E82D74; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 13:10:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iogearbox.net; s=default2302; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=rm4VFHyDYsqXBKBCZiX6B5oR3dBaXDqMYN7/nV3rI0o=; b=oVjhWQHWCGmKy1M95S4AZgQpao aPZfZFUwt0gqinnR6m4oxjlEQu8YYNfEY5wYHAgeWfURDtWW9eh6yB0j9w1ZCUaPLHjdamaTkC5dw K+HliZCX9gTUW4J5N3ZLj3X/HWKYNtmzDrCKjLeGPNMwa/mNmVIIswQyITTh20FlpaB1hmfeIarje KPLVkTfhs6Q9LtJaCzf6uyToiJPAlQYfVC3iPNUdYpd4HvBvKmS/mdOOnJvKRygqm1/0/4iZTRsfc F/q76zK1DIqtAZaVnLaXFKzZixIe1ayxB06fUp25+johy6c+NNtWNVcaowsQu3HkctlJdPinrEAPE LPFF1NqQ==; Received: from sslproxy03.your-server.de ([88.198.220.132]) by www62.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1ps7x5-000JeT-CV; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 22:10:51 +0200 Received: from [85.1.206.226] (helo=linux.home) by sslproxy03.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ps7x4-000Lnr-W5; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 22:10:51 +0200 Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Update the aarch64 tests deny list To: Stanislav Fomichev , Florent Revest Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, kpsingh@kernel.org, mykolal@fb.com, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, xukuohai@huaweicloud.com, mark.rutland@arm.com References: <20230427143207.635263-1-revest@chromium.org> From: Daniel Borkmann Message-ID: <60a7370b-9e6a-cba3-4d63-76d47a780982@iogearbox.net> Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 22:10:50 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Authenticated-Sender: daniel@iogearbox.net X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.103.8/26889/Thu Apr 27 09:25:48 2023) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/27/23 8:56 PM, Stanislav Fomichev wrote: > On 04/27, Florent Revest wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 4:32 PM Florent Revest wrote: >>> >>> This patch updates the list of BPF selftests which are known to fail so >>> the BPF CI can validate the tests which pass now. >> >> Note: I tested this denylist a few months back by sending a manual PR >> to https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf. >> At the time, it worked >> https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/4106542133/jobs/7085514761 >> (even though there seemed to be a known flake in the gcc variant but >> unrelated to the new arch support) >> >> Every time I wanted to have the CI run on my PRs, I had to annoy Manu >> by email (I wouldn't have the rights to trigger the CI by myself >> otherwise). So I haven't tested this *actual* patch rebased on the >> current CI before sending it to the list. (e.g. the >> module_fentry_shadow test has been added since then and I just assumed >> it would pass in CI like the rest) >> >> My understanding is that this patch should soon be picked up by the >> testing bot and we can use that CI run to check that everything works >> as intended. Let's wait for a CI green light before merging this! :) >> If there are errors I'll send a v2 > > Looks green now: > > Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev > > https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/4822595792/jobs/8590732278 That's awesome to see ... big batch of tests which this unlocks!