Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 28 Apr 2023 08:12:38 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Chanwoo Choi <cwchoi00@gmail.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
        Chanwoo Choi <chanwoo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] extcon next for 6.4
Message-ID: <ZEtj1oWqBlmgwc2b@kroah.com>
References: <1d2b9fd2-4a59-cb3b-2fd3-9f6635f3bbf8@gmail.com>
 <3b49bdb2-642e-214b-7334-911721f62ce6@gmail.com>
 <2023042544-cargo-reexamine-ed86@gregkh>
 <305aedea-599a-48b0-e3a9-6f71b75e14d8@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <305aedea-599a-48b0-e3a9-6f71b75e14d8@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 03:49:17AM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Dear Greg,
> 
> On 23. 4. 25. 22:22, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 09:58:47PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> >> Dear Greg,
> >>
> >> Gently ping for v6.4.
> > 
> > Ouch, something went wrong with your first email and it ended up in my
> > spam folder in gmail, so sorry about that :(
> 
> I'm sorry. I'll use the @kernel.org account on next time.
> 
> 
> > 
> > Is your tree included in linux-next already?
> > 
> 
> Yes. extcon.git was included in linux-next.
> 
> And my pull request edited the 'class_create()'
> Thus, it might have a conflict as following report[1] from Stetphen Rothwell (linux-next.git).
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZBhOTW9v9jzJVY7e@kroah.com/

Ok, I tried to pull this today, but I get the following error:

Commit: 40f9fc3c2b38 ("extcon: usbc-tusb320: add USB_ROLE_SWITCH dependency")
	Fixes tag: Fixes: 19685ae43489 ("extcon: usbc-tusb320: add usb_role_switch support")
	Has these problem(s):
		- Target SHA1 does not exist

Are you sure that linux-next actually passed this tree?

All of these were added to your tree only 12 days ago.  Perhaps we should just
wait until 6.5-rc1 for the new features, and take the bug fixes now?  Can you
redo this to make it so I can take the bugfixes after 6.4-rc1 is out, and throw
away this tree for now?

thanks,

greg k-h