Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753470AbXJALOv (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Oct 2007 07:14:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751691AbXJALOn (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Oct 2007 07:14:43 -0400 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:43623 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751657AbXJALOn (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Oct 2007 07:14:43 -0400 Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 13:14:41 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Denys Cc: Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.21 -> 2.6.22 & 2.6.23-rc8 performance regression Message-ID: <20071001111441.GA17357@one.firstfloor.org> References: <20070930144443.M52139@visp.net.lb> <46FFE17C.9020202@cosmosbay.com> <200709301425.37564.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> <20070930220452.M25621@nuclearcat.com> <20071001103026.M59805@nuclearcat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071001103026.M59805@nuclearcat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 505 Lines: 13 On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 01:30:52PM +0300, Denys wrote: > > Already i did, and it didn't show real failure point. There was no difference between the profile of the working kernel and the high load kernel? Perhaps you just have legitimate higher load? -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/