Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752921AbXJALa3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Oct 2007 07:30:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751354AbXJALaV (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Oct 2007 07:30:21 -0400 Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:49798 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751447AbXJALaU (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Oct 2007 07:30:20 -0400 Message-ID: <4700DA44.8020706@garzik.org> Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 07:30:12 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070727) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andi Kleen CC: patches@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH] [50/50] x86_64: Remove fpu io port resource References: <200709221231.836138000@suse.de> <20070921223251.1312913DCD@wotan.suse.de> <46F44D27.4050704@garzik.org> <200710011240.35802.ak@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <200710011240.35802.ak@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.1.9 on srv5.dvmed.net summary: Content analysis details: (-4.4 points, 5.0 required) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 667 Lines: 22 Andi Kleen wrote: > So far I still maintain i386 and x86-64. If Thomas wants to take both > over completely he can do that; but I won't bother handling any patches i didn't > write then anymore. What does that mean? Didn't we all agree that x86 and x86-64 are going to be merged? If yes, isn't it logical to avoid patches that extend the separation? This is just basic playing-well-with-others fundamentals. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/