Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
To:     Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
        Pawel Chmielewski <pawel.chmielewski@intel.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
        Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
        Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] sched/topology: add for_each_numa_cpu() macro
In-Reply-To: <CAAH8bW9SBrFG+gkH2sT4O_tEQaM-bNT2++v0iyjnuf_aME2DNg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20230430171809.124686-1-yury.norov@gmail.com>
 <xhsmhildak6t0.mognet@vschneid.remote.csb>
 <CAAH8bW9SBrFG+gkH2sT4O_tEQaM-bNT2++v0iyjnuf_aME2DNg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 03 May 2023 11:00:32 +0100
Message-ID: <xhsmhfs8dka4f.mognet@vschneid.remote.csb>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

On 02/05/23 14:58, Yury Norov wrote:
>> LGTM, I ran the tests on a few NUMA topologies and that all seems to behave
>> as expected. Thanks for working on this!
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
>
> Thank you Valentin. If you spent time testing the series, why
> don't you add your Tested-by?

Well, I only ran the test_bitmap stuff and checked the output of the
iterator then, I didn't get to test on actual hardware with a mellanox card
:-)

But yeah, I suppose that does count for the rest, so feel free to add to
all patches but #5:

Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>