Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <eb6530ac-a999-fc03-5f11-e1cba6be504d@ti.com>
Date:   Wed, 3 May 2023 17:46:08 +0530
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.10.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e: Add ESM support
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
CC:     <robh+dt@kernel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <vigneshr@ti.com>,
        <kristo@kernel.org>, <u-kumar1@ti.com>
References: <20230503093310.85779-1-n-francis@ti.com>
 <20230503093310.85779-3-n-francis@ti.com>
 <20230503114827.lutd2ebygxczvali@argue>
 <82a39b8e-96ad-faa2-714f-c8c6bfbcc5d6@ti.com>
 <20230503120200.4xqylyoiczx43esu@gradation>
From:   Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@ti.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230503120200.4xqylyoiczx43esu@gradation>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi Nishanth

On 03/05/23 17:32, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 17:25-20230503, Neha Malcom Francis wrote:
>> Hi Nishanth,
>>
>> On 03/05/23 17:18, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>> On 15:03-20230503, Neha Malcom Francis wrote:
>>>> Add address entry mapping ESM on J721E.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@ti.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e.dtsi | 1 +
>>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e.dtsi
>>>> index b912143b6a11..52bcde601eb8 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e.dtsi
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e.dtsi
>>>
>>> Why is'nt esm node introduced here?
>>>
>>
>> As it stands esm node is already in
>> arch/arm/dts/k3-j721e-r5-common-proc-board.dts in u-boot and since this
>> patch is motivated to keep the u-boot and kernel dts in sync, I haven't
>> added it here.
>>
>> Although... I could add it here similar to j7200 and take action to move to
>> the same in u-boot... maybe that is better route.
> 
> The core problem we have is that part of the hardware description is in
> u-boot and a large part is in kernel. That is wrong. eventually, we will
> drop u-boot.dtsi and r5-xyz.dts files.. This cleanup journey is towards
> that action.
> 
> we want kernel to be the canonical description of the hardware. which
> means u-boot or zephyr or something else will eventually just copy the
> kernel dts and it has information enough about the hardware to be able
> to boot.
> 
> each of the dependent ecosystems (u-boot, zephyr etc..) have a little
> bit of their own binding extensions (such as binman for u-boot), which
> is maintained in their own repos. But, the SoC hardware description,
> entirely should be available in kernel device tree.
> 
> So, please ensure esm is completely described as well.
> 

Right got it, will add the node in v5, thanks!

-- 
Thanking You
Neha Malcom Francis