Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 3 May 2023 20:07:55 -0700
From:   Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@quicinc.com>
To:     Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
CC:     Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-phy@lists.infradead.org>,
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp-crd: Add QMP to
 SuperSpeed graph
Message-ID: <20230504030755.GD870858@hu-bjorande-lv.qualcomm.com>
References: <20230425034010.3789376-1-quic_bjorande@quicinc.com>
 <20230425034010.3789376-7-quic_bjorande@quicinc.com>
 <ZFEAfv2GnGeblk-x@hovoldconsulting.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZFEAfv2GnGeblk-x@hovoldconsulting.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 02:22:22PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 08:40:09PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-crd.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-crd.dts
[..]
> >  &mdss0_dp0_out {
> >  	data-lanes = <0 1>;
> > -	remote-endpoint = <&pmic_glink_con0_ss>;
> > +	remote-endpoint = <&usb_0_qmpphy_dp_in>;
> >  };
> 
> It's a bit hard to follow what going on when using place holder nodes
> from the dtsi like this (instead of describing all the ports directly in
> the board dts). IIRC we went a bit back and forth over this earlier and
> we already use this scheme for the display port controllers, so I guess
> this is the price we pay for being consistent.
> 

I agree, this is why I argued in favour of keeping the of_graphs
together in a single node. But as long as we label things appropriately
it's pretty ok - and the alternative would be yet another undocumented
"rule".

So let's stick with this...

> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
[..]
> > +			ports {
> > +				#address-cells = <1>;
> > +				#size-cells = <0>;
> > +
> > +				port@0 {
> > +					reg = <0>;
> > +
> > +					usb_0_qmpphy_out: endpoint {};
> > +				};
> > +
> > +				port@1 {
> > +					reg = <1>;
> > +
> > +					usb_0_qmpphy_dp_in: endpoint {};
> > +				};
> > +			};
> >  		};
> 
> The binding describes three ports, where dp-in is port 2.
> 
> Perhaps you don't need to describe ss-in yet, but shouldn't the port
> numbers match? Should some of these be described as required in the
> binding?
> 

This should certainly be port@2, thanks for spotting.

Regards,
Bjorn