Received: by 2002:a05:6358:9144:b0:117:f937:c515 with SMTP id r4csp998437rwr; Fri, 5 May 2023 07:50:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5Cg10+DkGS5X5u+FYinJ65J8NpVKWi8/x5cg+2t6dT55z7KAT40fluFOxLd1+l7/3FWpPa X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:999a:b0:fc:8dfb:3195 with SMTP id ve26-20020a056a21999a00b000fc8dfb3195mr2285843pzb.23.1683298253458; Fri, 05 May 2023 07:50:53 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1683298253; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=H9dNDiLpnAgJFKybWOhr0+eIyg/y2hTnVKZCHwUqAO11pheAJWOmqjHU2LUsLg2XsK OCHNjE1XGERttHxX181b3kvYqEkslZqePaHyPHXkZoLyJ9tO7cdV8D/QT37DWjTDifhp r81o7cwmkTMIynlweoAsdBFVMZKGO4vN9sL91eQgpQOVCNo8qtRb2ToUC5pP9sb8Rkb4 C55jelVepRAgDqfHXZRXqvI4HTFPAdREYWmUFYtq4lr6o9g9Q5Eq8H171588x5c6jqNv 0cjDJig0vr9btZBlEtMp/eAUhFuV0WQMzIsJL5daRI4V2h07LMIrSr0rm7OvR8PeAZUe 96vQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:to:in-reply-to:cc:references:message-id:date :subject:mime-version:from:content-transfer-encoding:dkim-signature; bh=n1ke4TbuRdOf5IM10kJu2GT3dAkCudOmMEKNHG0MQH0=; b=JVLWMlGWl+8AN+/dHV9vtN0CKSnYflFGXG8/GoSVmvtHcx0q6sfrPuMLgtznCI0FvX H3mvtb2VJXoYSpPjbne/3Blsqto5d3e0kYfBWKg+byYzwftzH/JTYWL1vbm+fCseLiAB rG+9uQAgRGlZPvUSGqACWxzTMTSRZq9vC+gx+c0K3fBoJ3Uy6vkfOlafq0QUHbTvA1cp seR1bQvvFSr4eDPfqcG5LxSLnk47IsW3rHK1dzg+PGLKmWD86RYQfeL0bRCUx8klBxWd t396o6j48fsD+m/NLfX8tnzxwhdTVf8TJ+U4fWthJCTJ4YjbzCrLzybuMxqSrW34f/r2 50ig== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@joelfernandes.org header.s=google header.b=C5F9B+Od; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p15-20020a63ab0f000000b0051b2e37e657si2076962pgf.719.2023.05.05.07.50.33; Fri, 05 May 2023 07:50:53 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@joelfernandes.org header.s=google header.b=C5F9B+Od; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232476AbjEEOf4 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 5 May 2023 10:35:56 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60496 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232387AbjEEOfz (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 May 2023 10:35:55 -0400 Received: from mail-qv1-xf35.google.com (mail-qv1-xf35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f35]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC1C91634A for ; Fri, 5 May 2023 07:35:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qv1-xf35.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-61a80fcc4c9so8094526d6.2 for ; Fri, 05 May 2023 07:35:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelfernandes.org; s=google; t=1683297351; x=1685889351; h=to:in-reply-to:cc:references:message-id:date:subject:mime-version :from:content-transfer-encoding:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=n1ke4TbuRdOf5IM10kJu2GT3dAkCudOmMEKNHG0MQH0=; b=C5F9B+Odr/yooITjToObv9Z7pERPEZiQaRqO4oOga5SqMp0U1bcWjSH4QnIwPGh/D5 qCWJR92URhJgUOVwKJ6d/pupONq2JfpnPioFKWOy074AQdtI/KaJ3Ft5BEvr0ckeLHjQ 0Z4+I2GQPy5hmrRwONK91y/pTS7NQKc87g7Uw= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1683297351; x=1685889351; h=to:in-reply-to:cc:references:message-id:date:subject:mime-version :from:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=n1ke4TbuRdOf5IM10kJu2GT3dAkCudOmMEKNHG0MQH0=; b=CjF+XxyIl+VrmATdSQ9CD30ho0qYUU6DoZL8LUcQfVRo34AHxVmT4TrC1wC59kUGxD 8jrIOe8saJSH3Yw6LqIwEfB5fFKdvS+JSfowK4q5tYyBlaAfP1dcuKjzC4L3C3ZEbBT0 SU9PotJdrI/77QoXe2fzOCzLei+TRUvIvtn4ByzDRoT5agmMqXaXUWiBeKq6Jj1yzLeb tcLWBnIwhxh56B3APIuVTxZByTqSpHFvh3bGP3KgcPULu/oeRWb0yzttI/Wp6YdxfSPF ekuvBJ6iFdm4RJySUmAD5HjwB/ndwNTDyrE/05qYwNkaADLtRtfExz/NHuk7kgg3if7W BOtQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDxPHZHfReKmse4lRfjWhl0UEAIsWT/6n0dnhBkoYPb+dGvi8BLU mlQj2JeOxaRSbwNSHsGrmRXvVg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:3008:b0:61b:6cf2:eaf1 with SMTP id ke8-20020a056214300800b0061b6cf2eaf1mr1895447qvb.22.1683297350962; Fri, 05 May 2023 07:35:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-98-249-43-138.hsd1.va.comcast.net. [98.249.43.138]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y16-20020a0ca910000000b005ef6557834fsm630052qva.62.2023.05.05.07.35.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 05 May 2023 07:35:50 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Joel Fernandes Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] rculist.h: Fix parentheses around macro pointer parameter use Date: Fri, 5 May 2023 10:35:39 -0400 Message-Id: References: <20230505100621.5d468f95@gandalf.local.home> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Paul E. McKenney" , Frederic Weisbecker , Neeraj Upadhyay , Josh Triplett , Boqun Feng , Lai Jiangshan , Zqiang , rcu@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20230505100621.5d468f95@gandalf.local.home> To: Steven Rostedt X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (20B101) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On May 5, 2023, at 10:06 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BFOn Thu, 4 May 2023 12:19:38 -0400 > Joel Fernandes wrote: >=20 >>> void f(void) >>> { >>> struct test *t1; >>> struct test **t2 =3D &t1; >>>=20 >>> list_for_each_entry_rcu((*t2), &testlist, node) { /* work= s */ >>> //... >>> } >>> list_for_each_entry_rcu(*t2, &testlist, node) { /* broken */ >>> //... >>> } =20 >>=20 >> Yeah it is not clear why anyone would ever want to use it like this. >> Why don't they just pass t1 to list_for_each_entry_rcu() ? I would >> rather it break them and they re-think their code ;). >=20 > Remember interfaces should not be enforcing policy unless it's key to the > way the interface works. Oh yeah, 100% agree. I am not particularly against this particular patch but= I also dont see it as solving any problem. Feel free to Ack the patch if yo= u feel strongly about wanting it. - Joel >=20 > -- Steve