Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To:     James Seo <james@equiv.tech>, Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Cc:     James Seo <james@equiv.tech>, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
        linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 07/11] Documentation/hwmon: Revise sysfs interface
 specification
In-Reply-To: <ZFUaNQAxjvnFnsOr@equiv.tech>
References: <20230504075752.1320967-1-james@equiv.tech>
 <20230504075752.1320967-8-james@equiv.tech> <ZFSLN6KmGgfW4YzE@debian.me>
 <ZFUaNQAxjvnFnsOr@equiv.tech>
Date:   Fri, 05 May 2023 09:10:43 -0600
Message-ID: <87cz3en79o.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

James Seo <james@equiv.tech> writes:

> On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 11:51:03AM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
>> On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 12:57:48AM -0700, James Seo wrote:
>>> +**RO**    Read-only value.
>>> +**WO**    Write-only value.
>>> +**RW**    Read/write value.
>> 
>> Why are the permissions be emphasized?
>
> I don't remember, to be honest. I will deemphasize permissions.

Just to say ... you are interacting with a personality known for driving
contributors into the ground with nit-picky comments.  We do lean toward
minimal markup, but this is not an example that really needed to be
called out.  Do whatever seems best to you here.

Thanks,

jon