Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 8 May 2023 14:27:42 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To:     Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc:     Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>, chunkuang.hu@kernel.org,
        p.zabel@pengutronix.de, chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com,
        kishon@kernel.org, angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com,
        nathan@kernel.org, ndesaulniers@google.com, granquet@baylibre.com,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: mediatek: fix returning garbage
Message-ID: <ZFi5hqhsTKqV96hF@matsya>
References: <20230414122253.3171524-1-trix@redhat.com>
 <ZFTMPWp8LhwA9uHz@matsya>
 <db9c3190-28d8-199f-f4f0-a12524d0451e@gmail.com>
 <ZFipVfhLVyye/eud@matsya>
 <f5cf30b2-c29c-03ac-e7fc-4c7da2cd0c5b@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <f5cf30b2-c29c-03ac-e7fc-4c7da2cd0c5b@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On 08-05-23, 10:24, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> 
> On 08/05/2023 09:48, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On 05-05-23, 17:37, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On 05/05/2023 11:28, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > > On 14-04-23, 08:22, Tom Rix wrote:
> > > > > clang reports
> > > > > drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-hdmi-mt8195.c:298:6: error: variable
> > > > >     'ret' is uninitialized when used here [-Werror,-Wuninitialized]
> > > > >           if (ret)
> > > > >               ^~~
> > > > > ret should have been set by the preceding call to mtk_hdmi_pll_set_hw.
> > > > 
> > > > I have applied "phy: mediatek: hdmi: mt8195: fix uninitialized variable
> > > > usage in pll_calc"
> > > 
> > > Thanks Vinod, that was on my list for today as well. I was a bit puzzled
> > > because you took the patch that added it, but I wasn't sure if you would
> > > take the fix. How do you want to handle things like this in the future?
> > 
> > Fixes should be sent as Fixes patch
> > 
> 
> I'm not sure what do you mean. Patch subject includes the word fix and the
> patch has a fixes tag. What was missing here?
> 
> Does this mean you will take fixes for this driver in the future or do you
> want me to take care of them?

Yes I would take the fixes as well for the drivers

-- 
~Vinod