Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <20230508185218.183895955@linutronix.de>
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc:     x86@kernel.org, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
        Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
        Arjan van de Veen <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Paul McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>,
        Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>,
        "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@igalia.com>,
        Piotr Gorski <lucjan.lucjanov@gmail.com>,
        Usama Arif <usama.arif@bytedance.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
        xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
        linux-csky@vger.kernel.org,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
        linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
        Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Sabin Rapan <sabrapan@amazon.com>,
        "Michael Kelley (LINUX)" <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Subject: [patch v3 17/36] x86/xen/hvm: Get rid of DEAD_FROZEN handling
References: <20230508181633.089804905@linutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date:   Mon,  8 May 2023 21:43:54 +0200 (CEST)
Precedence: bulk

From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

No point in this conditional voodoo. Un-initializing the lock mechanism is
safe to be called unconditionally even if it was already invoked when the
CPU died.

Remove the invocation of xen_smp_intr_free() as that has been already
cleaned up in xen_cpu_dead_hvm().

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>


---
 arch/x86/xen/enlighten_hvm.c |   11 +++++------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---

--- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_hvm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_hvm.c
@@ -161,13 +161,12 @@ static int xen_cpu_up_prepare_hvm(unsign
 	int rc = 0;
 
 	/*
-	 * This can happen if CPU was offlined earlier and
-	 * offlining timed out in common_cpu_die().
+	 * If a CPU was offlined earlier and offlining timed out then the
+	 * lock mechanism is still initialized. Uninit it unconditionally
+	 * as it's safe to call even if already uninited. Interrupts and
+	 * timer have already been handled in xen_cpu_dead_hvm().
 	 */
-	if (cpu_report_state(cpu) == CPU_DEAD_FROZEN) {
-		xen_smp_intr_free(cpu);
-		xen_uninit_lock_cpu(cpu);
-	}
+	xen_uninit_lock_cpu(cpu);
 
 	if (cpu_acpi_id(cpu) != U32_MAX)
 		per_cpu(xen_vcpu_id, cpu) = cpu_acpi_id(cpu);