Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <5aec4689-fe63-abff-94d4-8e42cf5bba66@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 9 May 2023 09:04:38 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.10.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] KVM: x86: Do not unload MMU roots when only
 toggling CR0.WP with TDP enabled
To:     Mathias Krause <minipli@grsecurity.net>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
References: <20230322013731.102955-1-minipli@grsecurity.net>
 <20230322013731.102955-3-minipli@grsecurity.net>
 <e70af22a-f09f-aadb-8353-35b29d2def61@gmail.com>
 <b0d4b430-afd2-979c-e7d2-b53e131412ad@grsecurity.net>
Content-Language: en-US
From:   Robert Hoo <robert.hoo.linux@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <b0d4b430-afd2-979c-e7d2-b53e131412ad@grsecurity.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On 5/8/2023 5:30 PM, Mathias Krause wrote:
>>>    void kvm_post_set_cr0(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long old_cr0,
>>> unsigned long cr0)
>>>    {
>>> +    /*
>>> +     * CR0.WP is incorporated into the MMU role, but only for
>>> non-nested,
>>> +     * indirect shadow MMUs.  If TDP is enabled, the MMU's metadata
>>> needs
>>> +     * to be updated, e.g. so that emulating guest translations does the
>>> +     * right thing, but there's no need to unload the root as CR0.WP
>>> +     * doesn't affect SPTEs.
>>> +     */
>>> +    if (tdp_enabled && (cr0 ^ old_cr0) == X86_CR0_WP) {
>>
>> Curiously, this patch only affects tdp_enabled, why does legacy MMU also
>> see comparable performance gains?
> 
> Because 'tdp_enabled' just implies EPT / NPT and only 'tdp_mmu_enabled'
> decides which MMU mode to use -- either legacy or TDP MMU (see
> kvm_configure_mmu() and now gets invoked from vmx.c / svm.c).
> 
Ah, get it, thanks. The name indeed confuses me (and perhaps others).
After dig into,
1. kvm modules has a param "tdp_mmu_enabled", (in the first place) 
indicates KVM level's willingness on enable two dimensional paging. 
However, it in the end depends on ept/npt enabled or not on vendor layer.
So, uses a "tdp_mmu_allowed" to intermediately record this willness in kvm 
module init phase.
	/*
	 * Snapshot userspace's desire to enable the TDP MMU. Whether or not the
	 * TDP MMU is actually enabled is determined in kvm_configure_mmu()
	 * when the vendor module is loaded.
	 */
	tdp_mmu_allowed = tdp_mmu_enabled;
2. When vendor module init --> kvm_configure_mmu()
	tdp_mmu_enabled = tdp_mmu_allowed && tdp_enabled;

    tdp_mmu_enabled's semantics becomes, as its name indicates, the 
eventual tdp mmu enablement status.

    And, tdp_enabled, is the general (ept_enabled | npt_enabled).