Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Sender: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 8 May 2023 15:22:37 -1000
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To:     jiangshanlai@gmail.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
        linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/22] scsi: Use alloc_ordered_workqueue() to create
 ordered workqueues
Message-ID: <ZFmgXcSadQpizbwI@slm.duckdns.org>
References: <20230421025046.4008499-1-tj@kernel.org>
 <20230421025046.4008499-13-tj@kernel.org>
 <ZFmMaraKKz8D_YGY@slm.duckdns.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZFmMaraKKz8D_YGY@slm.duckdns.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 01:57:30PM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Applied to wq/for-6.5-cleanup-ordered.

Oops, strike that. All scsi core workqueues have WQ_SYSFS set which means
that their max_active could be adjusted upwards through sysfs. The shouldn't
be ordered workqueues. This only leaves NCR5380 the only remaining
conversion candidate; however, that one only uses a single work item, so the
better thing to do there is using the default @max_active instead.

I'm dropping this patch and will add a patch for NCR5380 in the next round.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun