Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 15 Dec 2001 16:32:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 15 Dec 2001 16:32:12 -0500 Received: from twilight.cs.hut.fi ([130.233.40.5]:5455 "EHLO twilight.cs.hut.fi") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 15 Dec 2001 16:31:56 -0500 Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 23:31:34 +0200 From: Ville Herva To: Urban Widmark Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 4GB file size limit on SMBFS Message-ID: <20011215233133.I12063@niksula.cs.hut.fi> In-Reply-To: <3C19A3CC.7020501@century.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from urban@teststation.com on Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 10:02:00PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 10:02:00PM +0100, you [Urban Widmark] claimed: > On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, Petr Titera wrote: > > The first patch was incomplete. It contained a calculation bug on the > smbfs side limiting the possible offset to 32bits unsigned. > > New patch vs 2.4.16 (and others) available here: > http://www.hojdpunkten.ac.se/054/samba/lfs.html BTW: the fsx test Dave Jones just pointed out pretty quickly fails on smbfs on 2.4.8ac2 (mounting a share from NT4SP6a). I don't have anything never to play with just now (1), but if you can't immediately reproduce it, I can compile a newer kernel for the left over box and give it a longer whirl. -- v -- v@iki.fi (1) I have a 2.4.16/ia64 on the corner, but fsx fails on IA64 with any fs ("mmap: Invalid argument"). Smbfs seems to work on ia64 otherwise... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/