Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 9 May 2023 10:24:32 +0800
From:   Wang Honghui <honghui.wang@ucas.com.cn>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH V2] locking: Fix a typo of comment
Message-ID: <BE152DE8EF273104+ZFmu4JjPKLhla6Y9@TP-P15V>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Feedback-ID: bizesmtpipv:ucas.com.cn:qybglogicsvrgz:qybglogicsvrgz5a-2
Precedence: bulk


As title

Signed-off-by: Wang Honghui <honghui.wang@ucas.com.cn>
---
 kernel/locking/mutex.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
index d973fe6041bf..fe7335fb63d4 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
@@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ bool mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner,
 		 * checking lock->owner still matches owner. And we already
 		 * disabled preemption which is equal to the RCU read-side
 		 * crital section in optimistic spinning code. Thus the
-		 * task_strcut structure won't go away during the spinning
+		 * task_struct structure won't go away during the spinning
 		 * period
 		 */
 		barrier();
@@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ static inline int mutex_can_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock)
 
 	/*
 	 * We already disabled preemption which is equal to the RCU read-side
-	 * crital section in optimistic spinning code. Thus the task_strcut
+	 * crital section in optimistic spinning code. Thus the task_struct
 	 * structure won't go away during the spinning period.
 	 */
 	owner = __mutex_owner(lock);
-- 
2.34.1