Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230507155506.3179711-1-mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
 <BL3PR11MB64842FA5ECB64DD2C6C9FA76FB719@BL3PR11MB6484.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
 <20230508-paralysis-disarm-fecee3f8a625-mkl@pengutronix.de>
 <CAMZ6RqL42d04S-pKuMEEMwd0ZoKhrHc2EDci8fv0SoSJVTf3Hg@mail.gmail.com> <20230509-helmet-oozy-c1136e384d2e-mkl@pengutronix.de>
In-Reply-To: <20230509-helmet-oozy-c1136e384d2e-mkl@pengutronix.de>
From:   Vincent MAILHOL <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
Date:   Tue, 9 May 2023 17:14:40 +0900
Message-ID: <CAMZ6RqLh1kQvCaGwjOS2fQuLAVuF_XJyAEqLtS89ufxBRhXvWA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RE: [PATCH] can: length: add definitions for frame lengths in bits
To:     Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Cc:     Thomas.Kopp@microchip.com, linux-can@vger.kernel.org,
        marex@denx.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Tue. 9 May 2023 at 15:50, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> On 09.05.2023 13:16:08, Vincent MAILHOL wrote:
> > > The diagram in https://www.can-cia.org/can-knowledge/can/can-fd/
> > > suggests that IMF is part of the frame.
> >
> > ISO 11898-1:2015 section 10.4.6 "Specification of inter-frame space"
> > makes it clear that the intermission is not part of the frame but part
> > of the "Inter-frame space".
>
> For this reason, it is good to have open standards...oh wait!

It is open is you (or your company, wink, wink) pay CHF 187:

  https://www.iso.org/standard/63648.html