Received: by 2002:a05:6358:9144:b0:117:f937:c515 with SMTP id r4csp5702854rwr; Tue, 9 May 2023 05:23:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ54edkOPhlw5rNVzbMELONukDiZ2xT/F9oZCGLyvcvyXsxfCZSCXiVqOjdidvIvB4djFGUu X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:ac2:b0:63d:2f13:200 with SMTP id c2-20020a056a000ac200b0063d2f130200mr20644332pfl.16.1683635009692; Tue, 09 May 2023 05:23:29 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1683635009; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=CgxpEF4+HxhAtcuY4bnlknPvr/sjDR4I/ROV7kH5izWrRR0rsE28PbU2Lk/m1xVtcb T92taMiZIflwclw57AHIhDVIQROs7aYIsExQdyDcX3JOpWYy/rFde0iNzSJA3jv7b/RY dWBa1Dnt16aXEAGzcokTRgCjJQ/w47Bpr3u2a0z7d36i1BbMbt/3Afc1UZ6ENxQJoDu7 9tCs66h+wNbWNlYyRlYXQRyJajQk7J/cp1Pu/amzxKB/jJpGpvobcOyf48XR1Ie9kj7k HyAne15OW5BCnKZxEabeRjrMj5KYzUAsgjmXAi+I/nR/ewyVt7SgmEy9mqC85wogTA5S J2Yg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:dkim-signature:dkim-signature:from; bh=JdyszAQFsS8NQ584CZnckJnpEhoUaXW9tnBOiTa+9+E=; b=TnNBJQ/WWG2A0S+KZ7NW2KImv9s60kBTrppCxeZ7xoA6+V8Y6xbJHBJrCQw1UH+OxH B6BXXC9JIV6UH2BTwnaRHnUsXCsxRdz2oPS4AQcSOARaQUrz9e5zRG38sF7SwaSXCySC ZVJ6f+CyL9tdtgqMM9Qrbv2au+FKVjm2xoxhO+NpvHbnUKrQzIqYvrjECZz54/eLvk9I 2MTbpBzkrCTLKYibCCo1LbHk2OTRqbaOuVqXjp+qdF8xfNvPnklBOxJ/eQ7Yt5wwXOc+ +6/t73U/mbNPbN0JwtdFFRoDFhkVhWQADqwtJHxdoLloSec+eYtrg99iKhDK1htGnghc APew== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b=ka9gkcGH; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020e; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i17-20020aa796f1000000b005d866387e7asi2327585pfq.181.2023.05.09.05.23.17; Tue, 09 May 2023 05:23:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b=ka9gkcGH; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020e; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230029AbjEIMKE (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 9 May 2023 08:10:04 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52848 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235692AbjEIMJ4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 May 2023 08:09:56 -0400 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D64493C05; Tue, 9 May 2023 05:09:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1683634184; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=JdyszAQFsS8NQ584CZnckJnpEhoUaXW9tnBOiTa+9+E=; b=ka9gkcGHPU/F0K+ngaz5jaCDeTzITcmJantNFEH1Q/42sdZ4zT1IqtMce7W/ZjZD1bK1+j /LNwDssKYbtn14emuSZbyff8IjECHOj44E32PB3y66ONqTaivar6HFMvTYpEn79bGOVSI8 sOjrIz9MvrC0jruLu+aWlOCPHHLUW+sovMocfUIwQQzie8Jw2EWX+LtwgcvbMB/fb++PT7 3V5LLpihTVTj/4ipngAecsP92q7WSv1hEdEi47Ocn0+UqB1lNCmcxgzxFfcOzQz6hdRbtH MZzhHOOgMIT3YAtQVGXh4XejswO34svSG9XWtwbNWw47oZdXADP7zBo3uAbL7Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1683634184; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=JdyszAQFsS8NQ584CZnckJnpEhoUaXW9tnBOiTa+9+E=; b=GXVTcObOnQaoFBT3flZUDZ+yT6E9sycBY79vdaY5U1FPyYZPuFxqBXtxFTxmCYvrEjr620 6gR4tFX9TtdUtDAw== To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: LKML , x86@kernel.org, David Woodhouse , Andrew Cooper , Brian Gerst , Arjan van de Veen , Paolo Bonzini , Paul McKenney , Tom Lendacky , Sean Christopherson , Oleksandr Natalenko , Paul Menzel , "Guilherme G. Piccoli" , Piotr Gorski , Usama Arif , Juergen Gross , Boris Ostrovsky , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Russell King , Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Guo Ren , linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Bogendoerfer , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, "James E.J. Bottomley" , Helge Deller , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Mark Rutland , Sabin Rapan , "Michael Kelley (LINUX)" Subject: Re: [patch v3 13/36] x86/smpboot: Remove cpu_callin_mask In-Reply-To: <20230509104915.GX83892@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20230508181633.089804905@linutronix.de> <20230508185217.956149661@linutronix.de> <20230509104915.GX83892@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Date: Tue, 09 May 2023 14:09:44 +0200 Message-ID: <87h6sl1zav.ffs@tglx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 09 2023 at 12:49, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 09:43:47PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> - /* >> - * Sync point with wait_cpu_callin(). The AP doesn't wait here >> - * but just sets the bit to let the controlling CPU (BSP) know that >> - * it's got this far. >> - */ >> smp_callin(); >> >> /* Otherwise gcc will move up smp_processor_id() before cpu_init() */ > > Good riddance to that mask; however is smp_callin() still an appropriate > name for that function? > > Would smp_starting() -- seeing how this kicks of CPU_STARTING not be a > better name? Something like that, yes.