Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 15 Dec 2001 17:40:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 15 Dec 2001 17:40:26 -0500 Received: from mailout06.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.19]:19096 "EHLO mailout06.sul.t-online.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 15 Dec 2001 17:40:11 -0500 Message-ID: <3C1BDFBD.8BF59605@t-online.de> Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 00:41:49 +0100 From: Gunther.Mayer@t-online.de (Gunther Mayer) X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.16 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Garzik CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andre Hedrick Subject: Re: Dropped patches -> dropped bugfix 2.4 since months ! In-Reply-To: <3C1BA20B.48FF8735@mandrakesoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Andre Hedrick wrote: > > Well blame that on the folks that are not taking kernel code that will > > allow you to solve this problem. Linus is the number one offender. > > Linus is taking some patches and not others right now... so what? A > couple of my patches, isolated and clearly unrelated to bio and mochel's > driver work, made it in. Others got dropped. > > I see several people (not just you Andre) whining about the dropped > patches, when it seems to clear to me that only a few things in specific > areas are getting applied right now. For you specifically, Andre, Jen's > patches have been slated for 2.5.x for a while, so it seems blindingly > obvious that he would not take your IDE patches at least until the bio > subsystem is finished and clean, since you IDE patches would clearly > depend on the bio changes. > > I do not believe this as a personal condemnation of your patches, or > bcrl's, or anyone else's. > > Patience is a virtue ;-) We have a long devel series in front of us > and we are only at the pre-patches to the FIRST 2.5.x release. Unfortunately, Andre's patch includes an important BUGFIX which must go into 2.4 (CompactFlash hang/IRQ storm on pcmcia-PCI adapter card). Despite I'm sending this bugifx for several months now it is not included yet! I understand Andre would like to get the whole patch accepted as I have no evidence he ever submitted my isolated (about 3-liner) bugfix. Andre, what are your plans concerning 2.4 ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/