Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 9 May 2023 14:30:15 +0200
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc:     linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>,
        Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= <kw@linux.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: PCI: rcar-pci-host: add optional
 regulators
Message-ID: <ZFo817TZtIn0Ry+d@ninjato>
Mail-Followup-To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
        linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>,
        Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= <kw@linux.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20230508104557.47889-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
 <20230508104557.47889-2-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
 <CAMuHMdWGaDT_XGpeVm-915hbxa8-w5303QWg0a0iCjqk998unQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZFlD7x99++k3yfE1@kunai>
 <CAMuHMdUS56xQbOcRx7kVhL_irQQR2cnDr0Y6p6q8tCjZ2U_dwg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XejAdsIjL01QPq9Q"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdUS56xQbOcRx7kVhL_irQQR2cnDr0Y6p6q8tCjZ2U_dwg@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk


--XejAdsIjL01QPq9Q
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


> > I couldn't find one and took what I think is the most used pattern. But
> > I wasn't entirely sure, this is why the series is still RFC.
>=20
> Upon second thought, shouldn't these supplies be part of a PCIe
> connector subnode, as they are not properties of the PCIe host
> controller itself?

Beats me. Current practice is to put it in the host controller.


--XejAdsIjL01QPq9Q
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=d+5H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--XejAdsIjL01QPq9Q--