Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 9 May 2023 17:19:32 +0200
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To:     Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, peterz@infradead.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] revert: "softirq: Let ksoftirqd do its job"
Message-ID: <20230509151932.0YIQkuy6@linutronix.de>
References: <57e66b364f1b6f09c9bc0316742c3b14f4ce83bd.1683526542.git.pabeni@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <57e66b364f1b6f09c9bc0316742c3b14f4ce83bd.1683526542.git.pabeni@redhat.com>
Precedence: bulk

On 2023-05-08 08:17:44 [+0200], Paolo Abeni wrote:
> Due to the mentioned commit, when the ksoftirqd processes take charge
> of softirq processing, the system can experience high latencies.

Yes. RT wise I tried a lot to keep ksoftirqd from getting scheduled.
With this change, it makes the life a lot easier.

Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>

Sebastian