Received: by 2002:a05:6358:9144:b0:117:f937:c515 with SMTP id r4csp6426165rwr; Tue, 9 May 2023 15:17:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ6kqefTuDh7EGosKN/KS+d46aeCRnUug7rsQ5NCAXaxTE4mdSfp/9XLb5mQjQOjWkRYGZiJ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:1a09:b0:63b:7119:64a9 with SMTP id g9-20020a056a001a0900b0063b711964a9mr20283488pfv.16.1683670658046; Tue, 09 May 2023 15:17:38 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1683670658; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jorFnw7+7fihb5yRTnrh5+bRqazAmAOD3yjEZk2+V8BceiC2UsD4MsXflK528TEU67 5932oDlsFNlNfzHp6l0lUe0wkv+Dj3xcJpuY6lPxnFebg3sjtxhpwoFg0BgR8lwn05b7 KnQ8kjRw73f2blFQHd5qHHlfw+k4E1vJawLOag/2EcC0cOxv9rw3k07YOnxEHoBM2KWF Mw2KwyVE4M9YJoipLinJET879CD4N8yolzCquW9f5GRpEyJwLM9WuH5tC3hSrBtY52NO lom98eg+5p0EtwRtLGqwddH4fTyowEHzVXkvR0UYZ/cJqUkYdIFIqe8oK1nPDS9jYu+v WkFw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=HFTWf8Q6u6YOliWH7JYrY34ve4n9vvCgsLuAyvV+jrw=; b=g+hsXXfRGhGwWnIgF835MAqzgGo5FQyCjEA0ADDE1wMIy5T5yZKFRXRgK+J+Kbkr6E eAbizGnqBo8rs4NPRFKOCQTl5Fd9/7sZysSUYkZIrPdQb0oQphMJqJGC+p9chOIbEuoL tgSbWKvcbSqEqeHn10RQcCbltDDlXp+B15UcqFNS/qAvtu/HjKVMZwXz4yiLgM0hajrs IuyfIvmU2obpNM/PkyI97ZU692plUNeSYmlrwwuT6XvDh3hv5bBsX1d0vyGaqghc8beY 6uayzKK9RvsOPxTF7eNswgCs3jhGnaarROj+kNdIIj2lKRcKOm+PEGCk5fM+sUTfjv1O D3aA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=YgOErB9D; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a206-20020a621ad7000000b0063473a51539si3152840pfa.398.2023.05.09.15.17.25; Tue, 09 May 2023 15:17:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=YgOErB9D; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235708AbjEIVy5 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 9 May 2023 17:54:57 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46888 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230124AbjEIVy4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 May 2023 17:54:56 -0400 Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA82D40F4 for ; Tue, 9 May 2023 14:54:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1683669295; x=1715205295; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=ijc4yO911iy4ToQafBBVxV4avm9m3Sd5d5IilgsWhvM=; b=YgOErB9DNkXrBZ+mfK1OkI8vCMd6/ozhV82cZBhc9FuQAVoSKljlyire RWTi2mbAwKS9E/qqtzfMcYv1EL9xDx47ev4/K9EjdiuiQDvs1MJ0m3OEX J0pnIlnDHQL/MzC2go2YRSLa8VBGb13vttQrH2qjs3XjU8ByaPOC+wKKa AE/YbHU+86QFMGw4RbQCldGnKk/3IOGgymbP6z8GsGCV6SZUUy4wJoNaI VJNvDuNJvSdAio+sCfm4HzAZws60sPaQXR5G9VpRzaXfKspIsxX96JXBI iFytrYgcB70gzCQiuJk4PMs7Vts9raU6DujvrdgB9YGHam2UcrYHqhmVQ A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10705"; a="415630724" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.99,262,1677571200"; d="scan'208";a="415630724" Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 May 2023 14:54:54 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10705"; a="764036951" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.99,262,1677571200"; d="scan'208";a="764036951" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO dea6d5a4f140) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmsmga008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 May 2023 14:54:53 -0700 Received: from kbuild by dea6d5a4f140 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1pwVIK-0002Xu-0g; Tue, 09 May 2023 21:54:52 +0000 Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 05:54:02 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Kent Overstreet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Kent Overstreet , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] lockdep: lock_set_cmp_fn() Message-ID: <202305100552.41Mi8Ctu-lkp@intel.com> References: <20230509195847.1745548-1-kent.overstreet@linux.dev> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230509195847.1745548-1-kent.overstreet@linux.dev> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Kent, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on tip/locking/core] [cannot apply to linus/master v6.4-rc1 next-20230509] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Kent-Overstreet/bcache-Convert-to-lock_cmp_fn/20230510-040030 base: tip/locking/core patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230509195847.1745548-1-kent.overstreet%40linux.dev patch subject: [PATCH 1/2] lockdep: lock_set_cmp_fn() config: loongarch-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230510/202305100552.41Mi8Ctu-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: loongarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/f265373c48cadb6f81e032df9893abffc370ab89 git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux git fetch --no-tags linux-review Kent-Overstreet/bcache-Convert-to-lock_cmp_fn/20230510-040030 git checkout f265373c48cadb6f81e032df9893abffc370ab89 # save the config file mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=loongarch olddefconfig COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=loongarch SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/md/bcache/ kernel/locking/ If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202305100552.41Mi8Ctu-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): kernel/locking/lockdep.c: In function 'print_chain_keys_chain': kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3592:46: error: passing argument 1 of 'print_lock_name' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types] 3592 | print_lock_name(lock_classes + chain_hlock_class_idx(hlock_id)); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | | | struct lock_class * kernel/locking/lockdep.c:732:47: note: expected 'struct held_lock *' but argument is of type 'struct lock_class *' 732 | static void print_lock_name(struct held_lock *hlock, struct lock_class *class) | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~ kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3592:17: error: too few arguments to function 'print_lock_name' 3592 | print_lock_name(lock_classes + chain_hlock_class_idx(hlock_id)); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/locking/lockdep.c:732:13: note: declared here 732 | static void print_lock_name(struct held_lock *hlock, struct lock_class *class) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/locking/lockdep.c: At top level: >> kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4898:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'lockdep_set_lock_cmp_fn' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 4898 | void lockdep_set_lock_cmp_fn(struct lockdep_map *lock, lock_cmp_fn cmp_fn, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +/lockdep_set_lock_cmp_fn +4898 kernel/locking/lockdep.c 4896 4897 #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING > 4898 void lockdep_set_lock_cmp_fn(struct lockdep_map *lock, lock_cmp_fn cmp_fn, 4899 lock_print_fn print_fn) 4900 { 4901 struct lock_class *class = lock->class_cache[0]; 4902 unsigned long flags; 4903 4904 raw_local_irq_save(flags); 4905 lockdep_recursion_inc(); 4906 4907 if (!class) 4908 class = register_lock_class(lock, 0, 0); 4909 4910 if (class) { 4911 WARN_ON(class->cmp_fn && class->cmp_fn != cmp_fn); 4912 WARN_ON(class->print_fn && class->print_fn != print_fn); 4913 4914 class->cmp_fn = cmp_fn; 4915 class->print_fn = print_fn; 4916 } 4917 4918 lockdep_recursion_finish(); 4919 raw_local_irq_restore(flags); 4920 } 4921 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lockdep_set_lock_cmp_fn); 4922 #endif 4923 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests