Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
From:   Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 10 May 2023 07:38:04 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKXUXMy3_krgwHMS6TaDZhBePkaHTHigntwBD0WFxMJ=DtgWYA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Situation of CONFIG_CLK_SUNXI_PRCM_SUN9I
To:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
        Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
        linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Dear Maxime,

with commit 49c726d55c1b ("clk: sunxi: Add Kconfig options"), you
introduce various build configurations for Legacy clock support for
Allwinner SoCs. Among them, you introduce the config
CLK_SUNXI_PRCM_SUN9I in drivers/clk/sunxi/Kconfig, but this config is
not used anywhere in the kernel tree.

Can we just delete this config CLK_SUNXI_PRCM_SUN9I again, as it is
not needed, or did you simply miss to adjust the Makefile for this
option to be effective?

I will gladly send a patch, once you could give me a quick pointer.


Best regards,

Lukas

Note: This is a resent email (see original email:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAKXUXMzqCktKz7vGN4_QAp4n1SeP0-YHL19evmVSfseZOemd5g@mail.gmail.com/);
now hopefully with an email address for Maxime that reaches Maxime.