Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760504AbXJDRzE (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Oct 2007 13:55:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756037AbXJDRyz (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Oct 2007 13:54:55 -0400 Received: from mail.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:59633 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754697AbXJDRyy (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Oct 2007 13:54:54 -0400 From: Andi Kleen Organization: SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Nuernberg, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) To: Dave Jones Subject: Re: [rfc][patch 2/3] x86: fix IO write barriers Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 19:53:16 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: Nick Piggin , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Torvalds References: <20071004052153.GA15131@wotan.suse.de> <20071004052258.GB15131@wotan.suse.de> <20071004173203.GC5828@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20071004173203.GC5828@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200710041953.16656.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 644 Lines: 18 > The only vendor that ever implemented OOSTOREs was Centaur, and they > only did in the Winchip generation of the CPUs. When they dropped it > from the C3, I asked whether they intended to bring it back, and the > answer was "extremely unlikely". > Do you know if it made a big performance difference? But yes we should probably just remove this special case to make maintenance easier. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/