Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762337AbXJDXQi (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Oct 2007 19:16:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755585AbXJDXQb (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Oct 2007 19:16:31 -0400 Received: from mail-gw3.sa.ew.hu ([212.108.200.82]:45500 "EHLO mail-gw3.sa.ew.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756657AbXJDXQa (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Oct 2007 19:16:30 -0400 To: akpm@linux-foundation.org CC: miklos@szeredi.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-reply-to: <20071004155128.62fc1098.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (message from Andrew Morton on Thu, 4 Oct 2007 15:51:28 -0700) Subject: Re: [patch 09/12] fuse: add list of writable files to fuse_inode References: <20071002155026.650555479@szeredi.hu> <20071002155222.373341208@szeredi.hu> <20071004155128.62fc1098.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Message-Id: From: Miklos Szeredi Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 01:16:21 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 795 Lines: 18 > hm. At no point in this patch series does anything actually get added to > these lists, so this patch is presently a no-op. > > I'll assume that it will get used later. But it is a bit odd to add > infrastructure in a patch series, then not use it. Why not hold the patch > back and include it in the patch series which actually uses these lists for > something? My stupidity. I somehow thought the patch does actually do something interesting when including it in this series, instead of holding it back for the writable-mmap series. Miklos - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/