Received: by 2002:a05:6358:3188:b0:123:57c1:9b43 with SMTP id q8csp1163489rwd; Sun, 14 May 2023 14:12:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ7msJG9pxO5YiNnuYvTZBCOIXW2a7xaYpq2HIGt3BCOIJ9dG6SJ+2h0K/EKpOICZY5wdy2E X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:5493:b0:105:5f6:8701 with SMTP id i19-20020a056a20549300b0010505f68701mr7186005pzk.22.1684098739281; Sun, 14 May 2023 14:12:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1684098739; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KNOJvn8RzhzUV77jCnn65Dmyi6ZK/hJIW59SUn56gQ1GXiPY04yKv47a8UDBazivKh 1tBC2F91CbiC+Nn368jKZU/x1csbQ2vO9iOq3sobbnibhD8HHs4Kk1DuQPRTSmTBPo+a Z/jHTD7BZkTjS++W5DKZjoiQZDhXH7YX85ucUzU39W0aGIh39FVWytJKFeL8Q135b1kl 9ox46NVbpwdUC098lXGABBE1r/1MQLN0z/fFtXXaSoX/70CER2X9kz25Ytx74Za1nD2t 09eUcb7qIa5H2celFj+1RY3JzgQ/el+Ex5nN9SCnYnyZrIBR0ZU9RQSxNMWI7qEAjHoP Ha5g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=jTLrV1t79VLaE1SDZkVCg5CZRdC8GYzApnYPaUee360=; b=XoxS+7VI7AA2kkmQhXVmukp/6M2rp4f8Oe2MmT/OglLxabLbjqdzxxMUZ8FCKxYLxx eMwXMeVBIBrPRW5rpO3LyXQUA1hLANf4sihuc8qbpWZclR1AkFpZ8iMrpHe1bdb2ou9V lahkYzE+yJ9a5cyb5LOoyxcVTAg+Feq+wTZDNe/nurW07Eksn/nYCUNfw/rJs3YVFBJf 3lz6FMB6xIO7dZjS0cYP4gca9RHl4Z1fnzGyQtMUHzSNeEgubbKpss4rgez8YoBuZTJy v1QwS7ysRPwCvOIH91aGC2Mry851i9Amr6QCB15GlOxmnd+GNfrORuFOlg6jOXZofxug fvIA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20221208 header.b=VeKFNu0S; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b24-20020aa79518000000b006434a04f2fcsi15388124pfp.297.2023.05.14.14.11.59; Sun, 14 May 2023 14:12:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20221208 header.b=VeKFNu0S; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237721AbjENUku (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 14 May 2023 16:40:50 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34586 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237575AbjENUko (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 May 2023 16:40:44 -0400 Received: from mail-ua1-x934.google.com (mail-ua1-x934.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::934]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0B41170C; Sun, 14 May 2023 13:40:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ua1-x934.google.com with SMTP id a1e0cc1a2514c-77d46c7dd10so55157863241.0; Sun, 14 May 2023 13:40:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1684096843; x=1686688843; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=jTLrV1t79VLaE1SDZkVCg5CZRdC8GYzApnYPaUee360=; b=VeKFNu0SlE8bemNa4W77yFCM58pPpmOyusQXhEtzIrdPMZaaNekjj3ImZnBcpBRfh+ D+Vl4urEyIHG7LNrtKn2fSu5HlQrPw+Avxh+f8aK2rI5WnBn+3RF0wOR/DAgntTAJjnd /2GfKh+7823LrzeFvh0AyDlcSngzHjYyOkCUSMrC9XVtcnjuLPJLimPrkDmS1nnRMTJL 6V8eGMDH0gkAYxhMSkA/bMODoxeRqgypT3anK9SvaLdJyf0R4fzMJXe0zBMF3r3o+WsL bc8qPx4zXERl93imXnMSTlJTiEorxgocgY1rjcPyoUizkojFojwh57dUzjxUSL0m1Rc5 zA0Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1684096843; x=1686688843; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=jTLrV1t79VLaE1SDZkVCg5CZRdC8GYzApnYPaUee360=; b=QWUrt5CzS0K8GGXUIN1kpN3P2DyQvGtyu+LeQBVgpPgnHZgWHldjHGUNF2zVZMO6L+ snGatnW6cCfQsL9NpUNvDaAXwZDTlPvhjWZU4ljgcOHLGsrutaMtnPFdloXo9m/DH6qt 64TmkouCSxOrfu8A1IZW3tclTm+bpyqWrYeZCcxMTPwV4yrypn926nX4TXsrBdJRSiFG hv6CxZuJKuO9KL56fovUWOpVUjOpekG8Ys1aKGhfGZh0DppNrgKAcNQfMHaLYEH1UsKC TKRuR2NpNFQyPU18HSyvFiwe6EBumAmug1MzgEvy2RZIEAfI5IcLqTakpboQEfD+yjj5 3eqQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDyL3mPZ/YTNZAm1lofGIvodm5uwgVFjs4cqnDjYIG6cYyN8KmqI 57dW01o8hscTvYPfuO2gAv4/kZpQYDhHDoyjvGA= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:913:b0:434:847e:e57b with SMTP id x19-20020a056102091300b00434847ee57bmr8747614vsh.10.1684096842784; Sun, 14 May 2023 13:40:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230412-increase_ipvs_conn_tab_bits-v1-1-60a4f9f4c8f2@gmail.com> <2bc64d6d-6aa7-1477-0cd-8a41e68fcc5@ssi.bg> In-Reply-To: <2bc64d6d-6aa7-1477-0cd-8a41e68fcc5@ssi.bg> From: Abhijeet Rastogi Date: Sun, 14 May 2023 13:40:05 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipvs: change ip_vs_conn_tab_bits range to [8,31] To: Julian Anastasov Cc: Simon Horman , Pablo Neira Ayuso , Jozsef Kadlecsik , Florian Westphal , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , netdev@vger.kernel.org, lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > One way to solve the problem is to use in Kconfig: > > range 8 20 if !64BIT > range 8 27 if 64BIT Thanks @Julian Anastasov. I appreciate the detailed response around why these limits exist. Personally, I won't be able to own the task of making these checks more intelligent, but for now, I wonder if it would be okay to accept the range increase to 27. I am sending a v2 patch to set a higher limit to 27. Thanks, Abhijeet