Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 15 May 2023 11:06:15 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
To:     Ilpo =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=E4rvinen?= <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>, Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>,
        Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>, Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>,
        linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
        Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@intel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] mfd: intel-m10-bmc: Manage access to MAX 10 fw
 handshake registers
Message-ID: <20230515100615.GH8963@google.com>
References: <20230417092653.16487-1-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
 <20230417092653.16487-5-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
 <20230427150712.GV50521@google.com>
 <dc53f4a2-b91f-e114-6da8-72cac82d508d@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <dc53f4a2-b91f-e114-6da8-72cac82d508d@linux.intel.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 10 May 2023, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:

> On Thu, 27 Apr 2023, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 17 Apr 2023, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > > On some MAX 10 cards, the BMC firmware is not available to service
> > > handshake registers during secure update erase and write phases at
> > > normal speeds. This problem affects at least hwmon driver. When the MAX
> > > 10 hwmon driver tries to read the sensor values during a secure update,
> > > the reads are slowed down (e.g., reading all D5005 sensors takes ~24s
> > > which is magnitudes worse than the normal <0.02s).
> > > 
> > > Manage access to the handshake registers using a rw semaphore and a FW
> > > state variable to prevent accesses during those secure update phases
> > > and return -EBUSY instead.
> > > 
> > > If handshake_sys_reg_nranges == 0, don't update bwcfw_state as it is not
> > > used. This avoids the locking cost.
> > > 
> > > Co-developed-by: Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@intel.com>
> > > Co-developed-by: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/fpga/intel-m10-bmc-sec-update.c | 17 +++++--
> > >  drivers/mfd/intel-m10-bmc-core.c        | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > >  drivers/mfd/intel-m10-bmc-spi.c         | 14 ++++++
> > >  include/linux/mfd/intel-m10-bmc.h       | 28 +++++++++++
> > >  4 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Applied, thanks
> 
> Did these end up falling throught the cracks as I've not been able to 
> locate where they were applied?

They've been in -next for a couple of weeks.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]