Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230202232517.8695-1-michael.christie@oracle.com>
 <20230202232517.8695-9-michael.christie@oracle.com> <aba6cca4-e66c-768f-375c-b38c8ba5e8a8@6wind.com>
 <CAHk-=wgadfsCnKHLON7op=Qs5t3w3PVz5ZDbvbKsfb=yBg=yjQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <78c5e150-26cf-7724-74ee-4a0b16b944b1@oracle.com> <48842e92-835e-bc3f-7118-48b8f415f532@leemhuis.info>
 <CAHk-=wicXCNR1bBioaAiBqEDgv-CoQD9z2RsM2VOTPzkK0xr8g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20230515-vollrausch-liebgeworden-2765f3ca3540@brauner> <CAHk-=wgXJ5VS1iBkfsG=HDjsyhn5XYDKt5xhQcNuz-e7VKyg8A@mail.gmail.com>
 <33b84605-1d0c-1b0e-7927-7ffa96b3c308@kernel.dk> <CAHk-=wiDqe+H7UnhD0qLbL8K8hnWUEdsRqcM4QnY=gZ3GytBRQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wiDqe+H7UnhD0qLbL8K8hnWUEdsRqcM4QnY=gZ3GytBRQ@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 15 May 2023 10:23:28 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjudDcq+TSaxOVX03iMTAhBDf6fup-tDhDpdQjGnKXgTw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 8/8] vhost: use vhost_tasks for worker threads
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc:     Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
        Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info>,
        Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com>,
        nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com,
        Linux kernel regressions list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
        hch@infradead.org, stefanha@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
        mst@redhat.com, sgarzare@redhat.com,
        virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, ebiederm@xmission.com,
        konrad.wilk@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 8:54=E2=80=AFAM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> Blush. I decided to build-test it, and then forgot to attach it. Here.

Btw, if this tests out good and we end up doing this, I think we
should also just rename that '.ignore_signals' bitfield to
'.block_signals' to actually match what it does.

But that's an entirely cosmetic thing just to clarify things. The
patch would look almost identical, apart from the new name (and the
small additional parts to rename the two existing users that weren't
touched by that patch - the header file and the vhost use-case).

                   Linus