Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 16 Dec 2001 11:41:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 16 Dec 2001 11:41:12 -0500 Received: from khan.acc.umu.se ([130.239.18.139]:53714 "EHLO khan.acc.umu.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 16 Dec 2001 11:41:00 -0500 Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 17:40:46 +0100 From: David Weinehall To: David Relson Cc: lkml Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.17-rc1 Message-ID: <20011216174046.F5235@khan.acc.umu.se> In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20011216103506.00d94b90@mail.osagesoftware.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20011216111939.00e1eed0@mail.osagesoftware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20011216111939.00e1eed0@mail.osagesoftware.com>; from relson@osagesoftware.com on Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 11:22:53AM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 11:22:53AM -0500, David Relson wrote: > At 11:10 AM 12/16/01, John Alvord wrote: > >You shouldn't fix every single defect, just the ones with wide > >impact. Otherwise the rcX series could go on a long time. john > > John, > > Well said. Fix the show stoppers in the rcX series for 2.4.17. Leave the > small ones for 2.4.18-preX. > > ... repeat above steps for 2.4.18-rcX and 2.4.19 > ... repeat for ... > > ... iterate until time for 2.6.0 :-) Uhm, hopefully the release of 2.6.0 won't mean that maintainance of 2.4.xx will cease. While it *might* be possible that 2.4.xx is bugfree enough, some smaller fixes and driver-backports will probably still be needed. Regards: David Weinehall _ _ // David Weinehall /> Northern lights wander \\ // Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel // Dance across the winter sky // \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/