Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760762AbXJESNo (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Oct 2007 14:13:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751281AbXJESNg (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Oct 2007 14:13:36 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:57674 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750811AbXJESNf (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Oct 2007 14:13:35 -0400 Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 14:12:22 -0400 From: Jeff Layton To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: Trond Myklebust , Peter Staubach , nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, Pierre Ossman , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [NFS] What's slated for inclusion in 2.6.24-rc1 from the NFS client git tree... Message-Id: <20071005141222.5afbb6b9.jlayton@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <30494.1191605410@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> References: <1191454876.6726.32.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20071004085206.0a8e37b5@poseidon.drzeus.cx> <1191506450.6685.17.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <30494.1191605410@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1494 Lines: 35 On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 13:30:10 -0400 Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 10:00:50 EDT, Trond Myklebust said: > > > How about a boot/module parameter to turn it on or off? > > > > I don't see any point in having a sysctl for something like this: either > > you have legacy applications or you don't. It is not something that you > > switch off as you go off to lunch. > > How does Joe Sysadmin tell if he has an affected legacy app or not? > > (The obvious "try it and see what breaks" is a non-starter for many places, > because you too easily end up in a loop of "enable it, find 4-5 show stoppers, > turn it off, fix them, lather rinse repease". Been there, done that, got > the tshirt - a project I got dragged into involves a large storage array that > appears to insist on exporting 64-bit stuff, and a large farm of clients that > are very 64-bit unclean....) > Note that "try it and see what breaks" isn't reliable either. If glibc gets back a 64 bit inode number that just happens to fit in the 32-bit field, then everything will work. You don't actually get an EOVERFLOW until st_ino overflows the field, and that may not happen often enough for testing this way to detect it... -- Jeff Layton - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/