Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 16 May 2023 11:15:43 +0100
Message-ID: <86bkikmvjk.wl-maz@kernel.org>
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To:     Kunkun Jiang <jiangkunkun@huawei.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
        "open list:IRQCHIP DRIVERS" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com>, <chenxiang66@hisilicon.com>,
        <tangnianyao@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchipi/gic-v4: Ensure accessing the correct RD when and writing INVLPIR
In-Reply-To: <f618c540-879c-ca5b-31af-e55472d8208c@huawei.com>
References: <20230412041510.497-1-jiangkunkun@huawei.com>
        <86y1mxl9m4.wl-maz@kernel.org>
        <f618c540-879c-ca5b-31af-e55472d8208c@huawei.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue)
 FLIM-LB/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL-LB/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/28.2
 (aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 04:57:17 +0100,
Kunkun Jiang <jiangkunkun@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
> > Wouldn't it be nice if irq_to_cpuid() could work out whether it is
> > dealing with a LPI or a VLPI like it does today, but also directly
> > with a VPE? We could then use the same code as derect_lpi_inv(). I
> > came up with this the hack below, which is totally untested as I don't
> > have access to GICv4.1 HW.
> > 
> > Could you give it a spin?
> 
> Nice, I will test it as soon as possible.

Did you ever managed to test this?

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.