Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932297AbXJEVBf (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Oct 2007 17:01:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932093AbXJEVBN (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Oct 2007 17:01:13 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:49515 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762921AbXJEVBM (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Oct 2007 17:01:12 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Guennadi Liakhovetski Subject: Re: [Q] APM depends on PM_SLEEP? Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 23:16:09 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org References: <200710051749.52685.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200710052316.10215.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 725 Lines: 22 On Friday, 5 October 2007 18:27, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Fri, 5 Oct 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Friday, 5 October 2007 16:18, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > > Why does APM depend on PM_SLEEP? > > > > Because APM uses the suspend core functions in drivers/base/power . > > Ok, perhaps, a "select" would be better?... Select doesn't work really well. It probably would be better to add something like APM_SUSPEND depending on SUSPEND. Greetings, Rafael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/