Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 16 Dec 2001 13:26:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 16 Dec 2001 13:26:12 -0500 Received: from mail.eunet.ch ([146.228.10.7]:29957 "EHLO mail.kpnqwest.ch") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 16 Dec 2001 13:25:52 -0500 Message-ID: <3C1CF53D.B88065FC@dial.eunet.ch> Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 19:25:49 +0000 From: Mario Vanoni X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.17-rc1aa1 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.17-rc1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org IMHO integrate _please_ Andrea's patches 100%. Dual SMP PIII550 with 1024MB memory CAS 2-2-2. Reason: latency, <30% with Andrea. Test: time qsbench -p 9 (Lorenzo Allegrucci): rc1aa1 resolves the latency in <30% the time with 120MB swap, <20% _without_ swap space present! time qsbench reaches 5m44.204s with rc1, <= 2.44.025s with rc1aa1, test a login in that time ..., wait Godot! Without swap the times are: <= 3m41.720s with rc1, <= 2m43.090s with rc1aa1. What is better if e.g. a "qsbench" occusr, wait 5 or 3 minutes for a response? I run my 3xUP and 1xSMP normally _without_ swap, all with lots of memory. Note: this with or without 2 (two) setiathome 24/7 on the SMP + all abitual work. See setiathome country Switzerland under Mario Vanoni, about place 87. Kind regards Mario, _not_ in lkml. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/