Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 16 May 2023 17:39:02 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To:     Peilin Ye <yepeilin.cs@gmail.com>
Cc:     Vlad Buslov <vladbu@nvidia.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
        Peilin Ye <peilin.ye@bytedance.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
        Pedro Tammela <pctammela@mojatatu.com>,
        Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 6/6] net/sched: qdisc_destroy() old ingress and
 clsact Qdiscs before grafting
Message-ID: <20230516173902.17745bd2@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <ZGQKpuRujwFTyzgJ@C02FL77VMD6R.googleapis.com>
References: <ZFv6Z7hssZ9snNAw@C02FL77VMD6R.googleapis.com>
        <20230510161559.2767b27a@kernel.org>
        <ZF1SqomxfPNfccrt@C02FL77VMD6R.googleapis.com>
        <20230511162023.3651970b@kernel.org>
        <ZF1+WTqIXfcPAD9Q@C02FL77VMD6R.googleapis.com>
        <ZF2EK3I2GDB5rZsM@C02FL77VMD6R.googleapis.com>
        <ZGK1+3CJOQucl+Jw@C02FL77VMD6R.googleapis.com>
        <20230516122205.6f198c3e@kernel.org>
        <87y1lojbus.fsf@nvidia.com>
        <20230516145010.67a7fa67@kernel.org>
        <ZGQKpuRujwFTyzgJ@C02FL77VMD6R.googleapis.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 16 May 2023 15:58:46 -0700 Peilin Ye wrote:
> > Given Peilin's investigation I think fix without changing core may
> > indeed be hard. I'm not sure if returning -EBUSY when qdisc refcnt
> > is elevated will be appreciated by the users, do we already have
> > similar behavior in other parts of TC?  
> 
> Seems like trying to delete an "in-use" cls_u32 filter returns -EBUSY

I meant -EBUSY due to a race (another operation being in flight).
I think that's different.