Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 17 May 2023 10:14:58 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To:     Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
        Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
        Michal Kubiak <michal.kubiak@intel.com>,
        Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
        Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 06/11] net: page_pool: avoid calling no-op
 externals when possible
Message-ID: <20230517081458.GA32192@lst.de>
References: <20230516161841.37138-1-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> <20230516161841.37138-7-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230516161841.37138-7-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Precedence: bulk

So while this looks ok, Eric Dumazet had looked into some optimization
for this touching the core code, and promised me to come up with an
even better version a while ago.  Eric, what's the state of your
optimizations for no-op DMA syncs?