Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 17 May 2023 08:06:24 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] dt-bindings: net: nxp,sja1105: document
 spi-cpol/cpha
Message-ID: <20230517080624.672d52a2@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <50cc1727-999f-9b7a-ef09-14461fa4ddfb@linaro.org>
References: <20230515074525.53592-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
        <20230515074525.53592-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
        <20230515105035.kzmygf2ru2jhusek@skbuf>
        <20230516201000.49216ca0@kernel.org>
        <50cc1727-999f-9b7a-ef09-14461fa4ddfb@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 17 May 2023 10:26:38 +0200 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17/05/2023 05:10, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 May 2023 13:50:35 +0300 Vladimir Oltean wrote:  
> >> On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 09:45:25AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:  
>  [...]  
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>  
> > 
> > Is my instinct that this should go to net-next correct?  
> 
> It would be great missing net-next was pointed out by checkpatch.pl.

FWIW, I'd have taken the patch as is. There isn't much the current
build tester can do for dt-bindings, anyway. But thanks for the resend
:)

I was wondering about checkpatch, too, but haven't come up with any
great solution. The problem is kind of at an intersection of checkpatch
and get_maintainer.