Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754286AbXJGOQJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Oct 2007 10:16:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752652AbXJGOP5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Oct 2007 10:15:57 -0400 Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu ([128.173.14.107]:51648 "EHLO turing-police.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752630AbXJGOP4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Oct 2007 10:15:56 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2 To: Oleg Verych Cc: Ingo Molnar , Jan Engelhardt , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Dave Jones , Krzysztof Halasa , Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1 , Helge Deller Subject: NAK nettiquete (was Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 07 Oct 2007 13:10:35 +0200." <20071007111035.GO22435@flower.upol.cz> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <20071006195105.GE22435@flower.upol.cz> <20071006194820.GA30579@elte.hu> <20071006210349.GG22435@flower.upol.cz> <20071007060706.GA18768@elte.hu> <20071007111035.GO22435@flower.upol.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1191766530_10413P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 10:15:30 -0400 Message-ID: <2614.1191766530@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1439 Lines: 39 --==_Exmh_1191766530_10413P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Sun, 07 Oct 2007 13:10:35 +0200, Oleg Verych said: > > > I added comment (like this), so anyone can skip reading body, if > > > headers are "Oleg Verych && NAK". In case if `NAK' have a magic > > > meaning in the LKML, like control characters in the tty, i'm sorry. > > > > yes, a 'NAK' has a particular meaning on lkml. > > But what about (NAK && ! any_important_kernel_developer_name)? The few times I've tried to NAK something outright, I've always tried to attach plenty of technical explanation (usually of the form "Gaak, this oopses my laptop") :), and cc: the relevant important_name, and hope they listen. Fortunately, most of the time I can get away with a politely phrased variation of "important_name would probably appreciate if you fixed XYZ and resubmitted" comment.. ;) --==_Exmh_1191766530_10413P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFHCOoCcC3lWbTT17ARAvzKAJ9vrNgjbKx2XsLdhG6nJkbTVzpUzQCeKaDV iygV5JNrjz75gv3lhcNnJLE= =aNjN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1191766530_10413P-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/