Received: by 2002:a05:6358:3188:b0:123:57c1:9b43 with SMTP id q8csp1405037rwd; Thu, 18 May 2023 11:31:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5zfVHlzr79FbkaeRaR4WkRUaQEmPcttwU9XAdlxDu0xRGv3V/3o5CKflxZGnr8qfMEodWz X-Received: by 2002:aa7:88c9:0:b0:64c:f4f9:de87 with SMTP id k9-20020aa788c9000000b0064cf4f9de87mr5890408pff.18.1684434667780; Thu, 18 May 2023 11:31:07 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1684434667; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=psI9VlZ4ZCiqoObTNJg265nODLbG9VqitXFh4AWxxuV6lb+OPdi/IyqoBHuMlcIDss 63PnLih2bk3Eqwo14B7rPFcAIG8FxP2tVC6Oj6WV7g+CUoIq3Y4WhRJ12AWtYO1C+icm 8VTgL5Ny1kOmlLNeqLF2dg0oie07oqrtKPIxkw/ipKYqxR7KnzmgadNVgEVeV2/A6Fuz G0/d7k1spBDVwlYlYo+Uq71q3/txpXeVbJV/kEcIkZqgJYg2hHFCfq4F+JY+wxmIRiNs jVQwxom1x95p9qZ5NzNHe2Bhe3bTPV30j3qSwo5o14l0Phg4KO8sSPEKlX44yWKMl2r2 QlrA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=RJi9ZlLdcLDeLRUcrDXyTC7zgfOSpkMfpLKIfWFhcvU=; b=cJkRnivvqj4tNMWd5W0W9XKqoMbZXsu3LrHtc7l+i0WSYPohoJx84eMzF4qP/DLKeM GDj/4MncDteKnAiHD0XKtCj/YGrRX9F7uhHEUKFiOXWviETVgQwsIog9/4wqYyheEWZw kEIv2qmT1mll+CnMsfsBvnzBSd2w53VQEKhXMS4gAnAS7tposIy+YbW1PBoOVC0CEBNN HimGWeRtOStgau1SnPsi+KjpaDd36RZO2x63iVMugM3hhmHItqLQoesq/duiXyKOoYoP 9zzrAxyrDBD5VrzLaL/igaJetUCn+XApqlgbeuTFnYG12LXSj/z2gVV12IDgm7BSsSXw 3aNg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=NepfBqdV; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h13-20020aa796cd000000b0064cecf7b981si2181416pfq.311.2023.05.18.11.30.54; Thu, 18 May 2023 11:31:07 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=NepfBqdV; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229695AbjERSYO (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 18 May 2023 14:24:14 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54772 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229449AbjERSYN (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 May 2023 14:24:13 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C686189 for ; Thu, 18 May 2023 11:23:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1684434204; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=RJi9ZlLdcLDeLRUcrDXyTC7zgfOSpkMfpLKIfWFhcvU=; b=NepfBqdVRNCffsLGEEH394sX4uGfAi8+RIOvm8cThpNWyXbdQDHpL8mQybTklU9xsKbyPz mV+cA9O4NB/etcLfPhKeTvZvYCDTD/MphL1zAR0sL6lGril/EhBoYcGu+nV54LZtXMQIe5 7RcB28LDQ3yp8MdAb5ImY1spWyASiN8= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-208-xNxDOZS-O3yjF8lhA3tZ7g-1; Thu, 18 May 2023 14:23:20 -0400 X-MC-Unique: xNxDOZS-O3yjF8lhA3tZ7g-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 294E029AB448; Thu, 18 May 2023 18:23:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-27-174.brq.redhat.com (unknown [10.45.224.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2CF7EC15BA0; Thu, 18 May 2023 18:23:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dhcp-27-174.brq.redhat.com (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1000 oleg@redhat.com; Thu, 18 May 2023 20:23:05 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 20:23:02 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Christian Brauner Cc: Mike Christie , linux@leemhuis.info, nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com, axboe@kernel.dk, ebiederm@xmission.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, mst@redhat.com, sgarzare@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/8] signal: Dequeue SIGKILL even if SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT/group_exec_task is set Message-ID: <20230518182301.GB5817@redhat.com> References: <20230518000920.191583-1-michael.christie@oracle.com> <20230518000920.191583-2-michael.christie@oracle.com> <20230518-kontakt-geduckt-25bab595f503@brauner> <7412912a-a470-bd3d-fb1c-54c094cc01ee@oracle.com> <20230518-ratgeber-erbeben-843e68b0d6ac@brauner> <20230518180809.GA5817@redhat.com> <20230518-fettgehalt-erdbeben-25587a432815@brauner> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230518-fettgehalt-erdbeben-25587a432815@brauner> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.8 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/18, Christian Brauner wrote: > > On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 08:08:10PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > On 05/18, Christian Brauner wrote: > > > > > > Yeah, but these are issues that exist with PF_IO_WORKER then too > > > > This was my thought too but I am starting to think I was wrong. > > > > Of course I don't understand the code in io_uring/ but it seems > > that it always breaks the IO loops if get_signal() returns SIGKILL. > > Yeah, it does and I think Mike has a point that vhost could be running > into an issue here that io_uring currently does avoid. But I don't think > we should rely on that. So what do you propose? Unless (quite possibly) I am confused again, unlike io_uring vhost can't tolerate signal_pending() == T in the cleanup-after-SIGKILL paths? Oleg.