Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 18 May 2023 16:13:41 -0400
From:   Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
To:     Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Cc:     Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] mm: intorduce __GFP_UNMAPPED and unmapped_alloc()
Message-ID: <ZGaG9ZngxbWCo7Yo@moria.home.lan>
References: <ZGWdHC3Jo7tFUC59@moria.home.lan>
 <20230518152354.GD4967@kernel.org>
 <CAPhsuW541pcsMKYah=2U8mUs8is3jAiNKC8Erte=RkAUGFO9EA@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZGZW0v3nRShO7r+Z@moria.home.lan>
 <CAPhsuW5BbbxinaH2aO=2Wa0aSQ3pkNwvnrgJv7fG4QcPr_j7+Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZGZfLHA8vuRJwa0f@moria.home.lan>
 <CAPhsuW6B3O_kWjWwr+UfYO3WRkznFqBNtcecFCSECBSiZBJDsA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPhsuW4Mm8z4kbVo8-sPU=QL2B1Sb32ZO7teWT8qienGNuxaeQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZGZ5PuQxDnjHlxAY@moria.home.lan>
 <CAPhsuW7Yk4bDFiAxbiGnpUfy-dEwO=dY-D5dQtzwu6fcy3zDCg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAPhsuW7Yk4bDFiAxbiGnpUfy-dEwO=dY-D5dQtzwu6fcy3zDCg@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 01:03:28PM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
> If we use compound_order(), we will round up to power of 2 for all
> allocations. Does this mean we will use 4MiB for a 2.1MiB allocation?

Yes. This means we lose on average 33% - I believe, someone with better
statistics might correct me - to internal fragmentation. But the buddy
allocator will be better at avoiding and dealing with external
fragmentation over time.