Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Sender: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To:     jiangshanlai@gmail.com
Cc:     torvalds@linux-foundation.org, peterz@infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
        joshdon@google.com, brho@google.com, briannorris@chromium.org,
        nhuck@google.com, agk@redhat.com, snitzer@kernel.org,
        void@manifault.com, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 04/24] workqueue: Rename wq->cpu_pwqs to wq->cpu_pwq
Date:   Thu, 18 May 2023 14:16:49 -1000
Message-Id: <20230519001709.2563-5-tj@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20230519001709.2563-1-tj@kernel.org>
References: <20230519001709.2563-1-tj@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

wq->cpu_pwqs is a percpu variable carraying one pointer to a pool_workqueue.
The field name being plural is unusual and confusing. Rename it to singular.

This patch doesn't cause any functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 0d5eb436d31a..80b2bd01c718 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ struct workqueue_struct {
 
 	/* hot fields used during command issue, aligned to cacheline */
 	unsigned int		flags ____cacheline_aligned; /* WQ: WQ_* flags */
-	struct pool_workqueue __percpu *cpu_pwqs; /* I: per-cpu pwqs */
+	struct pool_workqueue __percpu *cpu_pwq; /* I: per-cpu pwqs */
 	struct pool_workqueue __rcu *numa_pwq_tbl[]; /* PWR: unbound pwqs indexed by node */
 };
 
@@ -1616,7 +1616,7 @@ static void __queue_work(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
 	} else {
 		if (req_cpu == WORK_CPU_UNBOUND)
 			cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
-		pwq = per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwqs, cpu);
+		pwq = per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwq, cpu);
 	}
 
 	pool = pwq->pool;
@@ -3807,7 +3807,7 @@ static void rcu_free_wq(struct rcu_head *rcu)
 	wq_free_lockdep(wq);
 
 	if (!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND))
-		free_percpu(wq->cpu_pwqs);
+		free_percpu(wq->cpu_pwq);
 	else
 		free_workqueue_attrs(wq->unbound_attrs);
 
@@ -4501,13 +4501,13 @@ static int alloc_and_link_pwqs(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
 	int cpu, ret;
 
 	if (!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND)) {
-		wq->cpu_pwqs = alloc_percpu(struct pool_workqueue);
-		if (!wq->cpu_pwqs)
+		wq->cpu_pwq = alloc_percpu(struct pool_workqueue);
+		if (!wq->cpu_pwq)
 			return -ENOMEM;
 
 		for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
 			struct pool_workqueue *pwq =
-				per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwqs, cpu);
+				per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwq, cpu);
 			struct worker_pool *cpu_pools =
 				per_cpu(cpu_worker_pools, cpu);
 
@@ -4888,7 +4888,7 @@ bool workqueue_congested(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq)
 		cpu = smp_processor_id();
 
 	if (!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND))
-		pwq = per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwqs, cpu);
+		pwq = per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwq, cpu);
 	else
 		pwq = unbound_pwq_by_node(wq, cpu_to_node(cpu));
 
-- 
2.40.1