Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <6ab1852e-139f-579b-3ef4-5c98e0ea446d@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 May 2023 08:26:00 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.10.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] iio: mb1232: relax return value check for IRQ get
Content-Language: en-US, en-GB
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>,
        Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
        Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
        Andreas Klinger <ak@it-klinger.de>,
        Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Jonathan_Neusch=c3=a4fer?= <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>,
        Akhil R <akhilrajeev@nvidia.com>, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org,
        linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
References: <cover.1684220962.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
 <429804dac3b1ea55dd233d1e2fdf94240e2f2b93.1684220962.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
 <ZGUFJ5LRCzW2V0a1@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <1a3a84d4-1955-f0ee-5c6d-ab36fddc5e15@gmail.com>
From:   Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1a3a84d4-1955-f0ee-5c6d-ab36fddc5e15@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On 5/19/23 08:00, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> On 5/17/23 19:47, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 10:12:41AM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
>>> fwnode_irq_get() was changed to not return 0 anymore.
>>>
>>> Drop check for return value 0.
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> -    if (data->irqnr <= 0) {
>>> +    if (data->irqnr < 0) {
>>>           /* usage of interrupt is optional */
>>>           data->irqnr = -1;
>>>       } else {
>>
>>
>> After this change I'm not sure we need this branch at all, I mean that 
>> -errn is
>> equal to -1 in the code (but needs to be checked for silly checks like 
>> == -1).
>>
>> Hence
>>
>> Entire excerpt can be replaced with
>>
>>     if (data->irqnr > 0) {
>>
> 
> I agree. Furthermore, at a quick glance it seems the whole irqnr could 
> be dropped from the private data, and the private data struct could 
> probably be static. I'd send them as separate clean-ups though as those 
> changes are not really related to this return-value series.

Please, ignore everything I wrote above, except that I agree to your 
suggestion. I was writing utter nonsense. Sorry for the noise.

> 
> Yours,
>      -- Matti
> 

-- 
Matti Vaittinen
Linux kernel developer at ROHM Semiconductors
Oulu Finland

~~ When things go utterly wrong vim users can always type :help! ~~